President Chen Shui-bian (
However, due to the official restraints of their mission, they may not be able to challenge the hypocrisy of the major powers, which advocate maintaining the so-called status quo and stability in the region at the expense of democracy.
I have no doubt about US President George W. Bush's sincerity in support of democracy in Taiwan. When he stated his opposition to any unilateral decision either by China or Taiwan to change the status quo, he conspicuously avoided using the word "referendum."
Even senior US officials prefer to remain anonymous when they imply that the US is concerned about the referendum.
Bush and his administration decline to define the term "status quo," but the PRC uses its propaganda campaign to try to define the status quo as being based on "one China," with Taiwan a part of China. Beijing claims that any referendum in Taiwan is a step toward Taiwanese independence. Unlike the US, the PRC is not ashamed to oppose a democratic referendum process.
For Taiwan, it is unfortunate that certain China hands have a stubborn habit of appeasing the PRC at the expense of the fundamental political rights of the people of Taiwan.
They do not blame the PRC's threat to use force for disrupting stability in the Taiwan Strait, but instead accuse Taiwan's democratization of being a cause for concern.
If the US and China are sincere about maintaining stability in the region, the right approach is for the major powers to respect the democratic process and recognize the true status quo concerning national borders -- and integrate Taiwan and North Korea into the international community.
Taiwan is a full democracy and North Korea, like the PRC, is a communist totalitarian regime. North Korea is violating international rules and Taiwan is not. But to a certain degree both of them have been isolated from the international community. At the insistence of South Korea, the US and Japan refuse to recognize the rogue state of North Korea.
Submitting to the demands of the PRC, the US, Japan, South Korea and other major powers refuse to recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state.
If a Taiwan under authoritarian rule was good enough for the US, Japan and other major powers to recognize as a sovereign state, a democratic Taiwan is in a better position to be recognized as a sovereign state.
Taiwan has been excluded from the UN and international organizations such as the World Bank and the World Health Organization for over 30 years. The US and Japan have refused to recognize Taiwan as an independent state for over two decades. This is not the right way to handle international affairs.
Pro-China scholars and politicians used to argued that isolating China could only be bad for stability. Similarly, the isolation of Taiwan and North Korea is not helpful for the stability of the region. Therefore, the best approach for managing the two flash points in East Asia is for the major powers to respect democracy and recognize the status quo.
The US, Japan and South Korea should recognize North Korea and the US, Japan, Russia and South Korea should persuade the PRC to recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state and integrate Taiwan into the international community.
It was wrong and embarrassing for Bush to indicate opposition to Taiwan's democratic referendum process. He and his aides should know better.
When Lithuania declared independence and faced the threat of a military crackdown by the former Soviet Union, then US president George Bush instructed ambassador Jack Matlock to warn Soviet president Mikhail Gobarchev against the use of force and suggested a referendum as a proper way to resolve the impasse.
The current US president should stand firm on principle in dealing with disputes in the region. He should reassess the "one China" policy, respect democratic evolution and recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state.
Inclusion of Taiwan in the international community, instead of exclusion, will contribute to stability in the region.
James Wang is a journalist based in Washington.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS