To curry favor with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
Wen responded on the spot -- as if he had received an invaluable treasure -- that he appreciated Bush's position. However, Bush was questioned in the US for kowtowing to communist China by sacrificing democratic Taiwan.
His remarks caused a greater uproar here, as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) said that "President Chen Shui-bian's (
Self-interest has blinded the KMT.
First, the US has not changed its policy. It has only made it clearer. During a press briefing on Dec. 9, a White House official said that Washington does not want to continue the game of keeping an ambiguous policy anymore. Bush clearly told Wen that "we are going to be there" if Beijing attacks Taiwan by force. He especially pointed out that Bush's promise in April 2001 that he would do whatever it takes to help Taiwan defend itself remains unchanged.
The US also told Taiwan that Washington will not abandon its support for democracy and freedom in Taiwan. But it does not welcome any action by Taiwan that might change the status quo -- because its ultimate goal is to maintain peace across the Taiwan Strait.
Next, China's goal of annexing Taiwan remains unchanged, although its methods have changed. Wen himself reiterated Beijing's policy of "peaceful unification" and the "one country, two systems" model. Unlike former Chinese President Jiang Zemin (
Originally, Beijing had hoped that Bush could return to former US president Bill Clinton's "three noes" policy or announce opposition to Taiwanese independence. But Bush didn't do so, because that would be a real change in US policy. In fact, the country that really wants to change the status quo is China. Bush's comment against Chen was in fact empty talk.
Last, the problem in fact lies in Taiwan, which has neither knowledge of nor confidence in itself. Taiwan is already an independent democratic country, and does not have to change its status at all. It should continue its democratic development and should not be afraid of any external threats. Didn't Wen also say at the White House that Beijing respects the Taiwanese people's wish for democracy? Whether he was telling a lie or playing a trick, will he really dare to attack Taiwan by force?
Referendums are appeals to direct democracy to resolve significant domestic disagreements that the Legislative Yuan cannot resolve. Taiwan's political circles are trapped in a vicious battle over independence, and are very careless about the nation's democratic development.
Politicians should return to reason, and give up their vicious political struggles, so as to appropriately design both the referendum and constitutional systems in accordance with Taiwan's democratic development and the people's will.
Ruan Ming is a visiting professor at Tamkang University and a former special assistant to late general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party Hu Yaobang (
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS