President Chen Shui-bian (
Beijing, however, has decided that holding a defensive referendum means moving towards independence. Many party and government officials, therefore, issue statements criticizing and warning Chen, and they are also exerting heavy pressure on Washington to "deal with" Taiwan's referendum measures.
In response to pressure from China, officials from the US State Department and National Security Council have on several occasions over the past week expressed their concern over the defensive referendum. The State Department has unambiguously said that the US opposes a unification-independence referendum.
In fact, the US government understands Chen's repeated guarantees, and it also understands that a defensive referendum will not involve unification-independence or the "five noes," but in order to calm Beijing, Washington has to make a few harsh statements aimed at Taipei.
China has learned its lesson and currently uses the US to deal with Taiwan. In the belief that the road from Beijing to Taipei leads through Washington, they have kicked the ball over to the Americans. US officials therefore use various moralistic ways of persuading Taiwan in order to let Beijing see that they indeed have worked hard to deal with Taipei. At the same time, the US worries that Beijing (particularly the military hardliners) will force President Hu Jintao (
The US has, on several occasions, stated that it opposes Chinese use of armed force to solve the conflict with Taiwan. It has also made some preventive assessments of a few possible radical actions by Beijing, and it will have various scenarios prepared in response to a Chinese concentration of arms in southern China, military exercises, or armed threats against Taiwan.
Have the Americans not heard Taiwan's repeated explanations to Washington? We believe that American diplomats shall use various channels to explain to the White House, Congress and public that a defensive referendum is aimed at promoting and deepening Taiwanese democracy. Although the Referendum Law (
We want to make the Taiwanese public understand that a defensive referendum is necessary for the security of the nation. China has almost 500 missiles aimed at this country. Can we pretend that they do not exist? One of the topics for the defensive referendum is to make the public clarify whether or not they approve of China's removing theses missiles.
Beijing constantly belittles Taiwan, and wants to make it a special administrative region like Hong Kong or Macau. Another topic for the defensive referendum is allowing people to express whether they approve of Beijing's "one country, two systems" model.
A clarification of the public's position on these topics would be persuasive in strengthening national security by making the international community understand that Taiwan does not want to be threatened by, or be part of, China.
Parris Chang is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS