A week ago, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) proposed a referendum on Taiwan's sovereignty to be held on the same day as next year's presidential election. This has caused a sensation at home and abroad.
In response, James Moriarty, the senior director for Asian affairs at the US National Security Council, visited Taipei to express Washington's concern over the referendum issue. Richard Boucher, spokesman for the US Department of State, replaced the US' mild phrase about "not supporting" an independence referendum with a statement that the US would "be opposed to" such referendums. Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
These reactions are the result of a presidential campaign, the confrontation between the green and blue camps and the distorted legislation process caused by the Referendum Law (
Following explanations by government officials over the last few days, Chen has guaranteed that the goal of a defensive referendum is to let the people express their wish to maintain the status quo, and that it does not constitute a change to his "five noes" promise. The current plans for a referendum are aimed at a vote opposing China's missile deployment and the "one country, two systems" model. This is further evidence that the defensive referendum is a harmless expression of public opinion. Originally seen as provocative, it no longer challenges the status quo, but now becomes a direct expression of public opinion that does not violate Taiwan's promises to the international community.
The opposition to any unilateral change to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait, regardless of whether such a change would be the result of China's armed threats or Taiwan changing any of the symbols of sovereignty, represents the spirit of US cross-strait policy. "Not supporting" Taiwanese independence and "opposing" Chinese military action against Taiwan cannot be separated. In other words, the essence of US policy must be an unbiased "neither arms nor independence."
China has deployed 496 missiles across the Taiwan Strait and frequently sent its warships near our waters. China's threat to Taiwan far surpasses that of the former Soviet Union to the US when it deployed missiles in Cuba during the Cold War. Then US president John Kennedy did not hesitate to bring the world to the brink of nuclear war to make Moscow remove the missiles.
Threatened by China, Taiwan is justified in holding a defensive referendum to express the people's discontent.
What the US opposes is a referendum to change the status quo. The government has clarified that the defensive referendum will not touch upon the independence-unification issue and Chen's "five noes" policy. Rather, it will maintain the status quo. Since this is in line with the US' cross-strait policy, Washington should have no reason to oppose it. The US Congress has also expressed its respect for the Taiwanese people's decision regarding their future.
Moreover, having been oppressed by China for a long time, the Taiwanese people are entitled to decide their own future.
Speaking in terms of democracy, human rights and Asia-Pacific regional security, the US should support Taiwan's holding a harmless defensive referendum.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS