China's forceful interference in Taiwan's 1996 and 2000 presidential elections caused a strong backlash from Taiwanese voters and had results opposite to what Beijing wished for. Many observers thought Beijing would have learned its lesson and stayed out of next year's election, simply cold-shouldering the event. This is not what is happening, however. Beijing is clearly meddling and trying to block President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) re-election bid.
Beijing has rashly decided that Chen's goal of holding referendums and creating a new constitution mean Taiwan's independence and splitting from China. Beijing has recently been hurling loud threats at Taiwan. Wang Daohan (汪道涵), chairman of the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait, warned Taiwan that it has pushed the cross-strait situation "to the brink of danger." The director of the State Council's Taiwan Affairs Office said Taiwan will suffer a severe blow to the head, while the office's vice director, Wang Zaixi (王在希), said it may be difficult to avoid the use of armed force. Such language could be seen as a new version of the threats issued during the 1996 presidential election.
When Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) visits the US this month, he will have orders to demand that the US take more forceful and effective action to block the Chen government's move towards Taiwan independence. He will give the US a stern warning that if the US cannot deliver, then China itself will have to act. Is Beijing really concerned that holding referendums and creating a new constitution will bring Taiwan independence? After all, Chen hasn't been re-elected yet, and no one knows if he will be able to propose a new constitution by 2006, or what such a constitution would include.
So why is Beijing in such a rush? Does it dislike Chen and therefore uses the referendum and new-constitution issues as tools to defeat his re-election bid? Beijing is not providing covert assistance, but is overtly helping the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP). Aren't they afraid of once again tasting the bitter fruits of meddling in Taiwan's internal politics?
How should Taiwan respond to Beijing's actions? First, we must innoculate ourselves against the international community (particularly the US). The referendum and new constitution are domestic issues in which we cannot tolerate Beijing's meddling.
The referendum and new-constitution issues differ from China's "separatism" and "Taiwan independence." Beijing cannot say that Chen's government is working towards Taiwan independence just because Taiwan wants to hold referendums and create a new constitution. After all, even opposition parties advocating "one China" and unification understand the direction of public opinion and agree on these two issues.
The Communist Party of China (CPC) doesn't understand democratic politics, and simply entertains the wishful thinking that Taiwan, like Hong Kong, will give in to Beijing's will.
We are telling Washington that it must not be threatened by Beijing. Under pressure from military hardliners, Wen must make his position clear to Washington. In a recent briefing to Washington-based Taiwanese journalists, US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Randall Schriver said the US firmly opposes China's use of armed force to solve the conflict with Taiwan. US President George W. Bush and senior US government officials must reiterate this position.
More importantly, the US should take concrete action in support of such a policy. In other words, the US should send the US 7th Fleet to patrol the waters around Taiwan to let Beijing see that the US is no paper tiger, and that it has the determination and power to maintain peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.
Parris Chang is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences
RSS