China's forceful interference in Taiwan's 1996 and 2000 presidential elections caused a strong backlash from Taiwanese voters and had results opposite to what Beijing wished for. Many observers thought Beijing would have learned its lesson and stayed out of next year's election, simply cold-shouldering the event. This is not what is happening, however. Beijing is clearly meddling and trying to block President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) re-election bid.
Beijing has rashly decided that Chen's goal of holding referendums and creating a new constitution mean Taiwan's independence and splitting from China. Beijing has recently been hurling loud threats at Taiwan. Wang Daohan (汪道涵), chairman of the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait, warned Taiwan that it has pushed the cross-strait situation "to the brink of danger." The director of the State Council's Taiwan Affairs Office said Taiwan will suffer a severe blow to the head, while the office's vice director, Wang Zaixi (王在希), said it may be difficult to avoid the use of armed force. Such language could be seen as a new version of the threats issued during the 1996 presidential election.
When Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) visits the US this month, he will have orders to demand that the US take more forceful and effective action to block the Chen government's move towards Taiwan independence. He will give the US a stern warning that if the US cannot deliver, then China itself will have to act. Is Beijing really concerned that holding referendums and creating a new constitution will bring Taiwan independence? After all, Chen hasn't been re-elected yet, and no one knows if he will be able to propose a new constitution by 2006, or what such a constitution would include.
So why is Beijing in such a rush? Does it dislike Chen and therefore uses the referendum and new-constitution issues as tools to defeat his re-election bid? Beijing is not providing covert assistance, but is overtly helping the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP). Aren't they afraid of once again tasting the bitter fruits of meddling in Taiwan's internal politics?
How should Taiwan respond to Beijing's actions? First, we must innoculate ourselves against the international community (particularly the US). The referendum and new constitution are domestic issues in which we cannot tolerate Beijing's meddling.
The referendum and new-constitution issues differ from China's "separatism" and "Taiwan independence." Beijing cannot say that Chen's government is working towards Taiwan independence just because Taiwan wants to hold referendums and create a new constitution. After all, even opposition parties advocating "one China" and unification understand the direction of public opinion and agree on these two issues.
The Communist Party of China (CPC) doesn't understand democratic politics, and simply entertains the wishful thinking that Taiwan, like Hong Kong, will give in to Beijing's will.
We are telling Washington that it must not be threatened by Beijing. Under pressure from military hardliners, Wen must make his position clear to Washington. In a recent briefing to Washington-based Taiwanese journalists, US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Randall Schriver said the US firmly opposes China's use of armed force to solve the conflict with Taiwan. US President George W. Bush and senior US government officials must reiterate this position.
More importantly, the US should take concrete action in support of such a policy. In other words, the US should send the US 7th Fleet to patrol the waters around Taiwan to let Beijing see that the US is no paper tiger, and that it has the determination and power to maintain peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.
Parris Chang is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Owing to the combined majority of the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the legislature last week voted to further extend the current session to the end of next month, prolonging the session twice for a total of 211 days, the longest in Taiwan’s democratic history. Legally, the legislature holds two regular sessions annually: from February to May, and from September to December. The extensions pushed by the opposition in May and last week mean there would be no break between the first and second sessions this year. While the opposition parties said the extensions were needed to
RSS