The most serious espionage case in years was cracked this week. Tseng Chao-wen (
But this was not China's only espionage network here. Spies have been planted throughout the country, gathering information and endangering the national security. This should come as no surprise. The problem is how to deal with it.
Not long ago, National Security Council (NSC) Secretary-General Kang Ning-hsiang (
The greatest threat comes through various legal and illegal channels. China has exported diseases, drugs and weapons to Taiwan. At the same time, certain local media, politicians and activist groups are promoting unification in the name of patriotism. The public should be very concerned about these activities.
The Bureau of Investigation also estimates that there are over 3,000 Chinese agents here. These agents gather intelligence on Taiwan's political and economic structures and personnel, science parks and other strategically important locations, defense installations in particular.
China has also sent Taiwanese people back here to carry out tasks aimed at achieving unification. In particular, they have recently begun to recruit legislators and powerful business figures to participate in "advanced studies" in China. After being offered preferential treatment, these individuals come back as spokespeople for China and the Chinese nationalist agenda. The propagandist role they play is obvious, but the reaction of authorities is, more often than not, flaccid.
China has even begun to recruit retired government officials to further their business interests in China, as well as entice young Taiwanese to go to China as tourists or for study. This is compelling evidence of how the unificationist agenda is becoming more diverse and creative. In Taiwan we see no corresponding mechanisms to withstand this trend, and government agencies are not sufficiently integrated to develop and execute measures to address the threat. These gaps in the national security have to be filled.
It is imperative that the NSC, the agency in charge of our national security, the Bureau of Investigation and the MIB review each ministry and their organizational structure to this end. These agencies would also do well to take a good look at their own structures and practices and build up a national security net to protect the public from both the threat without and the emerging threat within.
China's espionage activities have been growing in sophistication and scope, and the response has been sluggish. But a late response is much better than no response at all.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough