President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) returned home from a trip to Panama and the US with many accomplishments. Some have hailed the trip as a landmark in Taiwan-US relations since the ties between the two were severed in 1979. Indeed it was.
Taiwan embarked upon a historical journey toward democracy in 1980s. Even though many Tai-wanese are still unsatisfied with the system and would like to refine it so that the democracy can be consolidated, the achievements in recent years have already been remarkable.
The 2003 Human Rights Award given to Chen by the International League of Human Rights is a high-profile recognition of the nation's effort to place itself on the same standard as advanced democracies in the area of human-rights protection. This award represents the pride of this small country that strives to be recognized by the international community for its efforts.
The award ceremony in New York City, the home of the UN and the center stage for world politics, was spectacular. To make the award even more meaningful, the US Congress welcomed Chen's stopover in the US with a resolution, 416-0 in a roll-call vote. As stated by two senior congress-men, this kind of consensus was truly rare on Capital Hill, because the representatives strongly believed that Taiwan deserved the recognition.
Many participants at the ceremony, as well as those who were watching TV at home, were moved when the congressmen congratulated Taiwan and its leader, prompting cheers and tears. It was no less spectacular that the audience in New York and the folks at home in Taiwan could share the emotion simultaneously through the televised broadcast. Major international media were also present, putting Taiwan and its leader in the spotlight. International media also followed the delegation throughout the trip.
The "no publicity" rule because of the private nature of the transit visit was rendered obsolete. That made the people quite happy because they knew that Taipei's relations with the US were not the price to pay for the warming relations between the US and China.
It was unbelievable to learn on the airplane that Alaska Governor Frank Murkowski was ready to hold a red-carpet reception right at the airport together with the chair-person of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and the key officials in the great glacier state. Such unprecedented reception by the governor was so overwhelming that it warmed the freezing air. What more could Taiwan ask for in any presidential trip to the US?
In every event that was described by the local media as a "breakthrough," the AIT chairperson, the representative of the US government dealing with Taiwan, was there with Chen. It signified the US endorsement of the public and private activities of Chen while in New York and Alaska.
We were told, again and again, that the US was pleased with the stopovers, and delighted that Chen was able to receive the rights award in New York. Apparently, the US government was delighted to see that its policy of promoting human rights and democracy was bearing fruit in Taiwan.
I am certain that the majority of the people in Taiwan share my feelings that the US government is taking the right approach in its relations with Taiwan. Heart-felt appreciation is not enough to express the gratitude of the government and people.
Joseph Wu is the deputy secretary-general to the president.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS