The street protests by half a million Hong Kong residents against Article 23 of the Basic Law have led to a new interpretation of the "one country, two systems" concept, where the "one country" stands for China and the "two systems" stand for "dictatorship" and "oppression," or, in other words, the dictatorship of the Chinese Communist Party of China in opposition to democracy and the oppression of the people, depriving them of their freedom and human rights.
China's "one country, two systems" is already in ruins after only six years in Hong Kong. The people of Taiwan have always opposed the concept, now more than ever.
Taiwan faces China's military threats, diplomatic isolation, economic seduction, and political and cultural infiltration. To achieve an enduring system, peace and sustainable development, we must work from within Taiwan to form a modern society based on democracy and freedom.
In 2000, Taiwan adopted peaceful and democratic means to complete the first transfer of power in its history.
Not only was this an unprecedented achievement, but it was also the first step towards the normalization of democratic politics. In order to deepen and further consolidate the nation's democracy, it is necessary to carry out referendums to make up for the shortcomings of the representative politics of Taiwan's indirect democracy, by -- whenever appropriate -- using the direct democracy of referendums to show the common will of the people regarding important livelihood and other public policies, constitutional amendments, or the creation of a new constitution.
What is so precious about a democratic and free country is that it allows its people to express differing points of view, using rational communication and mutual compromise on a public and open stage to gradually build a consensus and achieve national acceptance, thus building the idea of a shared community. Democratic countries are better at resolving conflict and promoting an international environment of peaceful coexistence, while dictatorships and authoritarian regimes look down on democracy, freedom and human rights and become a source of regional unrest.
Taiwan's efforts at protecting basic human rights, democracy and freedom conform with the mainstream values of the international community, and they also promote a peaceful and stable international environment. Freedom, democracy and human rights are effective tools for dealing with China's verbal attacks and military threats.
History shows that nations that have these things are destined to succeed, while dictatorial and authoritarian oppression are destined to fail.
We must not underestimate our nation simply because China has a larger territy, more manpower and more natural resources.
The sustainable development of a nation does not depend on the volume of military equipment or the size of natural resources -- the most important factor is the establishment of a system of democracy, freedom and human rights.
We must value the achievements of the nation's democracy and freedom by implementing and spreading the ideas of democracy, freedom and human rights.
We must highlight the oppression of China's authoritarian dictatorship and use international support for democracy, freedom and human rights to dissolve Chinese pressure on Taiwan and thwart its ambitions to annex Taiwan, and we must help the Chinese people move toward this goal.
Chen Lung-chu is chairman of the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing