Soong enamored with PRC
One of PFP Chairman James Soong's (宋楚瑜) favorite mantras is that we should put the economy first and politics second. Let us decode this statement to reveal its real meaning.
Soong frequently attacks President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) insistence on national security, his comment that there is one country on each side of the Taiwan Strait and the fact that the "one China" policy is unacceptable to the people of Taiwan. This is what Soong means by politics. This is what he criticizes about the interview Chen gave to the Far Eastern Economic Review ("Soong slams Chen over `FEER' interview," July 26, p. 4).
Based on what Soong says, the thing that matters most is economics, which, if we look again into his real meaning, means what is good for Taiwan-ese businesses operating in China. "Chen is provoking China at the expense of business," Soong said. So according to Soong, the security and prosperity of Taiwanese businesses in China are the only things that matter. As long as these businesses prosper, it doesn't matter whether the people of Taiwan lose their rights and freedoms; it doesn't matter if Taiwan loses its sovereignty.
For Soong and his supporters, the fact that the president of Taiwan is insisting on respect for the nation's sovereignty is somehow behavior that is provocative and out of bounds.
Soong speaks as if he were a young person in love. When a person is in love, the object of his affections can do no wrong. It would seem to be the case that Soong is in love with the PRC. He is constantly harping on the bad relationship between Taiwan and the PRC, always putting the blame on Taiwan's government. From Soong's perspective, any negative aspects of this relationship could never be Beijing's fault. Based on his past and present rhetoric, one would infer that Soong would even view the 450-plus missiles Beijing has aimed at Taiwan as somehow being Chen's fault. And this is why Soong behaves like a person in love -- the object of his affections could never be at fault.
People who follow this line of thinking are the biggest threat to the democracy in Taiwan, even more so than Beijing's missiles. They are willing to prostitute themselves, to turn Taiwan over to the enemy in order to obtain power and financial security, to get the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow they see in the skies over China.
This is the thing that I find most disappointing in Taiwanese society -- that there are people like Soong, who will eagerly abandon sovereignty and the democratic ideals of Taiwan just for money and power. They don't have an iota of the spirit found in people who had to fight for their freedom and independence, the spirit embodied in mottos such as New Hampshire's state motto, "Live free or die," or the Spanish communist revolutionary slogan, "It is better to die on your feet than live on your knees."
It seems Soong and company would be happy to live on their knees, as long as they have a nice, fancy, plush, Chinese cushion to kneel on.
Taiwan is a wonderful country, but it is also somewhat strange in one respect. It is the only country I know of where a leading politician can consistently make remarks criticizing the government in a way which even in democratic countries would be considered unpatriotic at the least, yet not be thoroughly denounced as a traitor. Such a politician, who attacks the president and government in a way that mimics the political attacks from a hostile, foreign government, should be tossed out into the street and pelted with rotten produce.
Kevin Hsu
New Jersey
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS