In preparation for next year's presidential election, the DPP has decided its campaign strategy: drawing a battle line between the pro-reform and anti-reform sides. With this strategy, the DPP can advance or retreat freely, while pushing the pan-blue camp into a defensive position.
Viewed from an offensive perspective, the DPP can emphasize its efforts to boost the economy and enact a referendum law (
Judging from the overall situation, I believe that the momentum of the KMT-PFP alliance has weakened -- because the alliance has repeatedly failed to dominate political issues. Plus, due to the unhappy marriage of the two political parties, the possibility of a split has gradually emerged in the pan-blue camp.
The blue camp's campaign strategy mostly focuses on creating the false impression of a united KMT-PFP alliance. This thinking is shaped by historical factors, as the two parties believe that the DPP will have no chance to win if they do not split apart. As a result, the blue camp is making all efforts to pretend to be united. Naturally, such unity is a hardship, because both the KMT and the PFP clearly know that the basis for unity does not exist.
The cooperation between KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Indeed, the split of the blue camp before the 2000 presidential election three years ago was crucial to the DPP's victory. However, there were many other reasons that contributed to the victory, among which the DPP's reform promises were a key to its success. The DPP has been flexible and vigorous at all times, and marched forward in line with the dynamic of the entire society. Besides, the DPP does not have the baggage of any party-run businesses, and it's incapable of moving money from state coffers to itself -- not to mention that it has no record of corruption. What deserves our attention is that the DPP has repeatedly proposed new reform issues recently. Such reform issues echo the drastic changes of society.
Historically, the blue camp is hardly able to confidently say it can satisfy people's demand for reform. Both Lien and Soong are merely playing the role of political commentators. The establishment of the KMT-PFP alliance has shown that it's more suitable for the blue camp to remain in opposition. Since the outward appearance (Lien) of the alliance does not correspond with the inner (Soong), it has failed to dominate political issues. It seems to me that the pan-blue camp is doomed to be led by the pan-green camp.
Chen Fang-ming is a professor in the department of Chinese literature at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS