The media have reported that in February of this year Shenzhen Harbor's container traffic surpassed that of Kaohsiung Harbor, and Kaohsiung's container traffic dropped to sixth place in the world. Although Shanghai and Shenzhen depend on China having become the world's manufacturing center, the added value of incoming and outgoing containers is not great. They earn only slim profits from shipping fees.
Recently, legislation establishing free trade ports has been passed in the spirit of taking over transit port services now handled by Hong Kong and Singapore. By complementing these services with Taiwan's manufacturing expertise and opening up port regions for processing work, manufacturers will be enticed to set up shop and create a source for goods. This could create added value for import-export container traffic, and in a way that makes the most of Taiwan's comparative advantages.
One question remains, however. After Kaohsiung harbor becomes a free trade port, will it really be restored to its past glory?
Taiwan's industries have advantages of manufacturing know-how and marketing skill. The government has also dedicated itself to developing the hardware and software infrastructure for port facilities. Nevertheless, because goods and people still can't freely and rapidly flow between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, free-trade ports fall short of their potential.
Because of the curse of "one China," we are always one step short of setting up direct links across the Strait. And due to the lack of direct links, Taiwan is unable to become the portal by which firms from all over the world enter China. In fact, a situation has been created in which more foreign businesses leave Taiwan every year.
We can understand that our national leaders reject the "one China" principle out of a desire to protect Taiwan's sovereignty. We can see the wavering and hesitancy of government authorities caught between economic inter-ests and national sovereignty. But political biases are swallowing up Taiwan's room for survival.
Perhaps turning Kaohsiung harbor into a free-trade port is a starting point for transforming economic and trade relations across the Strait, but it will be necessary to cleverly resolve the deadlock over direct links. On the basis of Kaohsiung's status as a special municipality, the city should be allowed to become a special zone for interaction between Taiwan and China.
Disputes over sovereignty that the central government is unable to avoid should be sidestepped, and direct city-to-city links should be opened with cities in China using a local-government-to-local-government model. In this way, the fear of full-scale direct links might be mitigated. Moreover, a starting point would be provided for normalization of cross-strait economic and trade relations, and a channel for Taiwan to take advantage of the China market would be opened up.
Taiwan's position on the international stage is a uniquely difficult one. Thus we will require a particularly flexible strategy to break through China's blockade. Turning Kaohsiung harbor into a free-trade port won't suffice to turn the situation around. Raising Kaohsiung's status to that of a special zone in order to break free of the shackles of "one China" and using the city as a site to test direct links might be a way to simultaneously look after the nation's sovereignty and economic interests.
Free-trade ports without direct links are like an eagle with clipped wings. No matter how it might flap its wings, it can't soar into the sky. Let's see how the authorities break free of constraints by letting Kaohsiung harbor lead Taiwan back to prosperity.
Cheng Chieh-yi is a researcher at the New Taiwan Foundation.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS