PFP Legislator Kao Ming-chien (
China is a problem for Taiwan both internationally and domestically. It is putting pressure on Taipei internationally. Taiwan joined the WTO not only due to trade needs, but also to gain visibility in international organizations. China put pressure on the WTO secretariat in an attempt at changing the name and status under which Taiwan could join the organization, something which Taipei firmly refused. Taiwan has made seven attempts to gain WHO observer status, both to give its people the medical treatment they deserve and to carve out some international living space.
Both sides of the Taiwan Strait have expended huge resources on winning diplomatic allies. Even though Taipei never will get more diplomatic allies than China, it is important for it to maintain a minimum number. Each time Taiwan's president visits a diplomatic ally, China does its best to stop him from crossing the borders of non-diplomatic allies, while Taipei does its utmost to break through China's defense lines. Taipei's purchases of defensive weapons is a necessary effort to avoid being militarily annexed by China. As soon as Beijing hears about a new purchase, it applies all the pressure it can. Taipei's efforts to avail itself of every opportunity are meant to send an important message to the international community -- Taiwan is a sovereign and independent state.
The PRC has ruled the Chinese mainland since 1949, while the Republic of China (ROC) has ruled Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu. The ROC was founded in 1911, long before the PRC was born in 1949, and the ROC government has all along maintained effective rule over Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu. For more than half a century, the people on either side of the Taiwan Strait have never paid any taxes or fulfilled any civic duties to the government on the opposite side. The two sides are mutually independent and sovereign states.
The concept that "one China means the PRC" that Beijing is trying to push on the international community is concerned only with power. The international confusion between PRC and ROC passports affects the right to travel of the Taiwanese. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs' announcement that it will add "Taiwan" to the cover of ROC passports is meant to further differentiate the two.
The Kao incident only serves to awaken the people's awareness of this nation's sovereignty and identification with Taiwan. It will not tolerate being confused with China. Even though politicians trying to benefit by pandering to both sides of the strait may be temporarily successful, clever talk about "one China" will only result in being abandoned by the people once their awareness of Taiwanese sovereignty is awakened.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS