PFP Legislator Kao Ming-chien's (
Kao has come under such strong pressure from public opinion as well as opprobrium from the DPP and the TSU for good reason. He was not a member of the Taiwanese delegation and his name was listed by Beijing as a representative of the PRC's"Taiwan Province." As a legislator , Kao should have been more politically astute. After all, the nation's sovereignty status is an important matter at international conferences.
Kao should have lodged a complaint the day he arrived in Kuala Lumpur against Beijing's attempts to twist his representative status and to humiliate Taiwan. He should have demanded a correction from Beijing from the start, instead of waiting until the furor back home had spun out of control. Instead Kao lodged a complaint with Chinese officials at the end of the conference, when it was way too late. Beijing had achieved its goal of creating the impression that Taiwan is part of China and Kao's protest became just a minor interlude in the international event.
Regardless of whether Kao really attended the WHO conference at China's invitation, anyone can see that Beijing was trying to use PFP members as pawns in its propaganda campaign and he was the latest dupe. Beijing took advantage of the PFP's friendly attitude toward it. Kao, a neurosurgeon, only entered politics when he accepted the PFP's offer of the legislator at-large seat. So elated by an invitation to the conference, Kao apparently did not notice that he was entering Beijing's trap. Others might argue that he has been conniving with Beijing all along.
It is unfortunate that the incident has ignited another furor over independence versus unification because it will only sharpen the ethnic conflict in society in the run-up to next year's election. People already associate the PFP with "selling out Taiwan," thanks to remarks by PFP Chairman James Soong (
After all, Soong has said he would bring Taiwan into the WHO within two years if the KMT-PFP tickets wins the presidential election next March. He has also stressed time and again that the joint ticket would accept a "one China" policy. As usual, Soong has yet to explain in detail just how he plans to execute this diplomatic breakthrough in the WHO. By failing to give an explanation, Soong has inevitably allowed all kinds of speculation that are detrimental to him, as well as fears that he may accept China's "one country, two systems" and turn Taiwan into a local government of China on a par with Hong Kong and Macau. He has done little to dispel such worries.
The furor has driven home one lesson for the nation's political parties and politicians -- they must always be alert and never underestimate Beijing's machinations. The PFP should especially take note of this.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.