Nobody could accuse PFP Legislator Kao Ming-chien (
Taiwan has, of course, been struggling to participate in this conference organized by the World Health Organization (WHO) and little wonder, given that the nation is the third hardest-hit by the virus. All along China has put obstacles in Taiwan's way which might well have cost Taiwanese lives.
China's own behavior as the originator of the SARS virus, which it tried so hard to cover up, has earned it international opprobrium. But its behavior toward Taiwan should cause an international outcry. It has, at the same time, both blocked Taiwan's access to WHO aid and expertise, while claiming that, as the legitimate sovereign of Taiwan -- a claim it bases on the craven acceptance by most of the world's governments of its "one China" blackmail -- it has the responsibility for looking after Taiwan's health, and has discharged this responsibility well.
Kao has played a key part in Beijing's attempt to sustain this absurdity, holding two video conferences with Chinese SARS experts last month, so that his real constituency -- namely Zhongnanhai -- can use these events to back up its outrageous claims. Now this Chinese agent, who sits as a representative of the Taiwanese people but, as an at-large legislator, has not actually had a single vote cast for him in Taiwan, is busy again in Kuala Lumpur trying to belittle this country and weaken its international position.
Center for Disease Control Director-General Su Ih-jen (
We cannot but help feel that with SARS under control here, the WHO needs Taiwan now far more than Taiwan needs the WHO. In the early days of the outbreak, when pooled expertise was important, the global body did everything it could not to provide this information to Taipei for purely political reasons. Now the WHO wants to show that it is on top of SARS, it is the WHO's need for information that is greater than Taiwan's need for help. If it needs this information it should, as our mothers told it, have to ask nicely. Why should Taiwan give its knowledge away to a body that won't even address it by name.
In this light it is about time that people who care about this country's stature -- which, of course excludes the pan-blue camp and about 80 percent of the media -- stopped indulging the government in its spinelessness, stopped suggesting that any nod from exclusive clubs of "sovereign nations" to the Taiwanese begger at their door was worth having. It would have been better for Taiwan not to send an official delegation at all. That would have made Kao's status as an agent of China all the more obvious. As for what to do with Kao himself, let Taiwanese patriots take off the kid gloves and show that Beijing dupes like him are no longer welcome in the legislature or, in fact, in this nation.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS