As a result of China's unreasonable obstruction, Taiwan failed to gain observer status at the World Health Assembly (WHA) on May 19. Chinese leaders have no conscience and are inhumane. They play with politics, preventing the Taiwanese people from getting help from the World Health Organization (WHO). This in turn has caused more than 80 Taiwan-ese to lose their lives.
I made it clear to the international media in Geneva that SARS was not invented by Taiwan. The virus was produced in China and imported to this country, inflicting great damage on Taiwanese people. Illegal Chinese migrants are still entering Taiwan, posing a threat to people's health -- so the government has to fight both SARS and illegal migrants.
Chinese Vice Premier Wu Yi (
The head of the Department of Health and Taiwanese experts should attend SARS prevention conferences held by the WHO to provide first-hand information. If Taiwan becomes a loophole in the WHO's anti-SARS network, not only its 23 million people but the whole world will be at risk. Diseases see no national boundaries, and neither should medicine and public health.
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan was quoted by his spokesperson at the WHA as saying that to save one life is to save humankind. If the WHO believes in this idea, it should not allow China to lead it by the nose because Tai-wan's accession into the WHO is not a political problem, but one related to health. It also involves humanitarianism and human rights.
Taiwan expects the WHO to dispatch more experts here to help contain the epidemic. But so far, the two visiting WHO professionals seem to have acted only as observers and collected information. They avoided contact with health authorities. We hope that WHO experts in the future can participate in anti-SARS efforts, rather than observing from the sidelines.
We were gratified that this time the US finally voiced its support for Taiwan's participation in the WHA and SARS prevention conferences. Japan also took the floor, but their statements were indirect and devious. If Japan had truly cared about people's health in East Asia, it should have confidently supported Taiwan's WHO bid and participation in the SARS prevention work.
Some EU member countries opposed Taiwan's participation at the WHA last year. Slight progress was seen this year as they did not express their opinions. We hope that EU countries can step forward and show their support next year.
The SARS outbreak may continue to escalate in China. Since the Chinese government continues to cover up the epidemic, the WHO, the US and other countries will find it difficult to offer their help. Taiwan is the victim and so is the rest of the world.
Therefore, we appeal to the international community: to help Taiwan's WHO bid is to help themselves because health truly transcends national boundaries.
Parris Chang is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Jackie Lin
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS