Taiwan felt indignation and outrage over Beijing's demeaning treatment of it at the World Health Assembly (WHA) last Monday, then the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait indicated to the Straits Exchange Foundation that it was willing to donate medical supplies to help this country's battle against SARS, including 200,000 pieces of protective clothing, 100,000 N95 masks and five ambulances with quarantine capability. The move of course immediately invited a lot of discussions and mixed feelings, but mostly disgust .
No one would be naive enough to think there is any noble or even half-decent intention behind Beijing's move. The Chinese leaders can't possibly be trying to ease the injured feelings of Taiwanese, since the issue apparently has never graced their minds before. For example, while Beijing's opposition to Taiwan gaining observer status at the World Health Organization (WHO) was predictable, it could have at least handled the matter more sensitively, such as focusing on under-the-table persuasion, in view of the serious outbreak of SARS here.
But repeatedly on public occasions, even at the WHA meeting, Chinese Vice Premier Wu Yi (
Then on Friday, as a result of Chinese pressure, the director-general of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in New York was literally blocked from the doors of the UN headquarters after he was invited by the UN Correspondents Association to brief it on Taiwan's efforts to join the WHO and fight SARS.
Beijing is not trying to help Taiwan -- just the opposite in fact. If it really wanted to help, it would not have objected to Taiwan gaining WHO observer status. Whatever assistance it has offered is too little and much too late. The third peak of infections here is estimated to be coming under control and Center for Disease Control Director Su Yi-jen (
Under the circumstances, if the government accepts China's "offer of help," it will have to pay a heavy price. First, Beijing will probably try to take credit for bringing the epidemic here under control. Second, accepting the donation would be a concession to Beijing's lies -- that Taiwan has no need to join the WHO, because it is receiving sufficient help from China as a "province."
The government should show a little spine and say no thank you to China's offer. Or tell the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait to donate the material -- via a non-governmental organization such as the International Red Cross -- directly to hospitals. After all, any foreign government or individual can make such a donation. If Beijing thinks it that channel is too insulting, that is just too bad.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough