One lesson we learned from the outbreak of SARS is how fragile Taiwan becomes when faced with a national crisis.
Look at what happened in the last month. The Taipei City Government accused the Executive Yuan of overlooking the potential spread of SARS. The central government was obsessed with its initial record of zero mortality, zero local transmis-sions and zero transmission abroad. The lack of effective crisis management when an outbreak of SARS hit the Taipei Municipal Hoping Hospital speeded up the spread of the virus.
Hsinchu Mayor Lin Jung-tzer's (林政則) tried to block the transfer of three SARS patients to Hsinchu General Hospital. Residents in other cities and counties have also opposed the transfer of SARS patients to hospitals in their neighborhoods.
KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) boycotted a national security meeting convened by President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to collect advice and opinions from the opposition. It would have been their opportunity to privately express to the head of state their views on how to control the epidemic. Then came the public finger-pointing between ruling and opposition legislators over whether the Taipei City Government has mishandled the SARS outbreak.
Embedded in all of this political wrestling is a lack of mutual trust and democratic maturity. This spells the greatest danger for the country.
In contrast, the US' democratic system handles crises in a much more mature fashion. After the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, the US government and citizens at all levels united in their fight against common enemies: al-Qaeda and the Taliban. They encouraged each other and extended unanimous support to the government in its handling of the crisis.
The US has a true civil society shaped by more than 200 years of processes which have fostered mutual trust. This mutual trust shone brightly in the flourishing display of national flags and in patriotic speeches coming from various sectors of society. Americans offered their assistance and condolences to the victims of the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania, even though the only thing Americans shared was nationality.
In Taiwan, such human dignity was also shown after several typhoons hit the country. People worked hand-in-hand with their neighbors in rebuilding. Still, what separates the people of the US from so many others is that, in their hearts, they trust their countrymen.
Regretfully, we have not shown a united front in the face of the SARS crisis. Citizen participation is essential to democracy. But democratic maturity is only achieved through rational debate and mutual respect.
The main reason the oppositions refused to help the government was because of past rivalries. Taiwan's experiences over the past three years illustrates that political stability has a direct bearing on economic development and public confidence. Only a civil society that pursues political reconciliation and cooperation between the governing and opposition parties can constantly develop and produce the optimum benefits of democracy.
This is a time when all Taiwanese should stay calm and united, and understand the importance of being vigilant in peace time. Moreover, it is also a time for us to develop a sense of community.
In troubled times, a free market system of and democracy makes it a lot easier to love each other. While Taiwan is enjoying its economic and political achievements, it still has a long way to go in terms of fostering trust.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of