The SARS outbreak that originated in China has resulted in disasters for Taiwan and several other countries. Meanwhile, Japan is now voicing support for Taiwan's participation in the World Health Organization (WHO) after witnessing the SARS outbreaks in China and Taiwan. Japan is calling for observership status for Taiwan to stop a potential loophole in the global epidemic control network while circumventing political problems.
Recently the Japanese government has notified China twice of its desire to support Taiwan's entry into the WHO. Beijing has expressed its opposition, but Japan's recent gestures have been a great boost for Taiwan's pursuit of the rights of its 23 million people. After the SARS epidemic is over, the WHO will inevitably have to review China's cover-up of its epidemic. At that time, the serious harm caused to Taipei will also come under the international spotlight. Asian countries which have close relations with Taiwan are likely to take a more serious look at the consequences of this nation being excluded from global epidemic control -- if only for their own self-interest -- because they could very well be the victims of this lapse.
In an attempt to stop the WHO's assistance to Taiwan, Chinese Vice Premier and Minister of Health Wu Yi (
The "attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health" has been the WHO's objective since its inception. However, Beijing's cover-up and obstructionism in the SARS crisis threw a monkey wrench into the WHO's epidemic control network. Only when the situation began to spin out of control in China and reports of SARS outbreaks emerged in Hong Kong, Vietnam, Canada and Taiwan did the global health body really began to intervene. More than 500 people have died from SARS, thousands more have been hospitalized and tens of thousands have been quarantined. The economic losses incurred by these outbreaks are difficult to estimate.
The WHO must never allow a repeat of this mistake. It must formulate a strategy to deal with the Chinese government's habitual cover-ups and to prevent damage to the security and welfare of people around the world.
The people of Taiwan long ago lost hope in Beijing's capacity for soul-searching. After the 921 earthquake three years ago, China tried to block international aid to Taiwan. When did the Chinese leadership ever care about the plight of the people of Taiwan? The WHO should understand that excluding Taiwan for political reasons can incur a huge price. Allowing the people of this country to be exposed to the threat of disease is also against the spirit of humanitarianism.
The SARS outbreak has told us clearly that China is incapable of taking care of Taiwan. On the contrary, China by its intransigence has harmed the lives of Taiwanese time and again. The WHO should help Taiwan remove this threat instead of kowtowing to Beijing and abetting in its vice.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS