A march originally scheduled for yesterday to promote a name change for Taiwan was rescheduled for September due to the SARS epidemic. However, Taiwan's continuing exclusion from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the difficulty of containing the SARS outbreak have once again highlighted China's thuggish political maneuvers against this country -- and why Taiwan needs a name change.
To break through China's diplomatic blockade and push for the country's participation in international organizations, President Chen Shui-bian (
Unfortunately, despite its efforts Taiwan has not overcome the prevailing hegemonic and self-
interested attitudes in international politics. Year after year, the question of Taiwan's observership has been excluded from the agenda of World Health Assembly meetings.
This year's WHA meeting is scheduled for May 19. Over the past month, the international media as well as the legislatures in the US, Japan and Europe have publicly stressed the importance of letting this country into the WHO. In an article published in the Washington Post last Friday, Chen stressed that the international community should not exclude Taiwan from the WHO because this is not only against the spirit of humanitarianism but can also create a loophole in the global health care network, thereby endangering the entire world.
It is unfortunate that the Chinese leadership in the Zhongnanhai is still unable to understand how it is letting down the Taiwanese people at this crucial moment, as they have done so many times in the past. Just when Taiwan urgently needs help from the international community, Beijing's leaders continue to spout the "one China principle" and do whatever they can to block this nation's entry into the WHO.
The "one China" discourse has always been the foundation of Beijing's diplomatic blockade against Taiwan. The government certainly will not vie with Beijing for the right to represent "China." Speaking at a fundraising event last month, former president Lee Teng-hui (
But the name-change movement is not something that can yield results in the short term. The DPP government is already pushing for some changes, such as adding the word "Taiwan" to passport covers and changing the names of the nation's representative offices overseas. But these are merely tactical moves. To win support from other countries in the diplomatic arena, Taiwan needs strategic thinking.
To join international organizations, the government needs to emerge from the "one China" rut and use "Taiwan" as its name. Only by pushing for a name change can the country build itself as a polity and thereby establish a national identity.
Joining the WHO under the name "Taiwan" this year is unlikely -- but there should be no let-up in the push for a name change. The people should have no doubt that Taiwan is the name of our country.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS