On Thursday night, the Department of Health designated severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) as a contagious disease. Now that the public health system has declared war on the disease, both the central and local government authorities will be able to impose compulsory quarantine measures on suspected SARS patients and public venues such as airports and train stations. This will be a great help in the fight against the disease.
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications has rejected a proposal from opposition lawmakers calling for charter flights for Taiwanese businesspeople in China. The reason they cited for such flights -- that they would reduce the risk of infection in Hong Kong, which has been declared a SARS affected area -- is completely ridiculous.
Moreover, the six new SARS cases discovered in Taiwan on Wednesday are suspected to have originated in Beijing while visitors were there on business. This shows that China's SARS-affected areas are no longer limited to Hong Kong, Guangdong or other areas along the southeast coast. The disease has spread to Beijing and renders the call for charter flights meaningless. Because clear demarcation of China's SARS-affected areas is no longer possible, and because preventive measures on planes cannot guarantee that one will not contract the disease before boarding a flight, the call for charter flights is meaningless.
After reports of mysterious pneumonia came out from Guangdong Province in November last year, the Chinese authorities imposed a news blackout on the outbreak, which coincided with the Chinese Communist Party's 16th National Congress. As a result, the outbreak spun out of control.
In an era of convenient travel, SARS is transmitted on the wings of a plane. It has been spreading within China for at least four months, yet China never notified the WHO. Even now, Beijing refuses to let experts from the WHO investigate conditions inside China. This attitude is the greatest obstacle to controlling the epidemic. In contrast to China's resistance, Taiwan notified the WHO immediately after discovering suspicious cases of pneumonia and adopted measures to quarantine patients, but these efforts met with politically motivated official indifference on the part of the WHO. How utterly unfair. No wonder US Congressmen have spoken out against the WHO's exclusion of Taiwan.
The Department of Health and Taipei City's Bureau of Health had some differences of opinion over emergency measures to control the spread of SARS. But both the Department of Health and Taipei City forgot the biggest hole in Taiwan's armor against the epidemic -- China. All of Taiwan's SARS cases originated in China. Thus unless China eradicates the spread of SARS, the only way that Taiwan can cut off the source of infection is by adopting emergency measures to prevent contact with China. This newspaper recommends that Taiwan temporarily suspend all travel between Taiwan and China for purposes of tourism or commerce.
China has refused to cooperate with the WHO and has refused to exchange information about SARS with other countries. Having allowed probable SARS patients to travel around the globe, China must bear the greatest responsibility for the spread of the disease. Epidemic prevention knows no borders. China's leaders should throw open their doors, allow the WHO to provide assistance, and eradicate SARS. They should allow Taiwan to join the WHO and allow all people to enjoy the same standard of humanitarian medical treatment.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS