Folks in the opposition parties and pro-China media have been going all out to attack the Chen Shui-bian (
But their opposition to war is very questionable. Remember, they have frequently served as Beijing's mouthpieces and have never missed a chance to use China's military threats to intimidate pro-independence forces. Every time former president Lee Teng-hui (
Deep down, they are supporters of Chinese military power because they can use the threat of it to ensure their political influence. They habitually use Beijing's military threat to intimidate their political opponents.
Why did they become ardent anti-war advocates? It certainly was not out of any deep-seated belief in pacifism. The reason is very simple. They oppose Chen and therefore they oppose his policies. They oppose him because they suspect Chen is not loyal to China, because they view him as an advocate of independence and therefore an enemy of China.
Following the rise of Chinese nationalism across the Strait and the transition of political power in Taiwan, their feelings toward the US have become increasingly complex. In the days of KMT rule, former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (
However, with the rise of native Taiwanese awareness and following the KMT's loss of power, the pro-unification folks have fallen into despair. Their feelings toward Taiwan and its people have also become increasingly complex. On top of this come the economic incentives from China and the calls of Chinese nationalism. All these have changed the pro-unification people's feelings toward the US and Taiwan.
The US no longer appears to be Taiwan's protector against a possible Chinese invasion. On the contrary, it has become a new hegemony aiding pro-independence forces, attempting to stop the unification of China and preventing China from becoming stronger. For them, China is no longer a threat. It is their motherland.
For this reason, the pro-unification media and scholars in recent years have always subscribed to anti-US opinions around the world. By disseminating fears about a unipolar world, they have tried to vilify the US and its role as a global policeman. Meanwhile, they have tried to paint China as the world's future superpower.
At every key moment in Taiwan's domestic politics or the international situation, the pan-blue camp has echoed the Chinese nationalists across the Strait. All these have been occasioned by Chen and the US. In their eyes, Chen is an obstacle to China's unification, the US an obstacle to China becoming strong.
Since coming to power the DPP has copied the KMT's foreign policy verbatim -- pro-US, pro-West and providing more aid to diplomatic allies. That's because Taiwan has no other choice. Taiwan of course would like to be pro-China, pro-Russia or pro-the entire world, but none of these countries support this country in the least bit. Now the opposition is criticizing the DPP for adopting the very same policies of the former administration. Supporting the US is now called kissing America's backside. Providing aid to allies is now called "sugar daddy diplomacy."
As they accuse Lee and Chen of attempt to split China, what a shame that the opposition folks don't realize they are attempting to split Taiwan.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS