Given that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein remained unwilling to disarm after a lengthy international debate and diplomatic effort, US President George W. Bush issued a 48-hour ultimatum earlier this week, which meant military conflict would be inevitable if Saddam did not leave Iraq.
Yesterday morning, Bush announced the beginning of the military campaign. It is regrettable that no peaceful resolution to the dispute was found and that the US was still unable to disarm Iraq even with the threat of a looming war. Now that the war has begun in earnest, we can only pray that it may end early, that its scope may be as small as possible and that the casualties may be kept to a minimum.
Taiwan is a peace-loving country. Having experienced the agony of war and turmoil in the past, the people of Taiwan know the evils of war -- the immense suffering that it brings to people -- and therefore oppose war as a solution to disputes. However, when war is a necessary evil for maintaining lasting peace -- ?and when only by resorting to force can one eliminate the threat of terrorism -- a "surgical use of force" may become inevitable.
This is the stated objective of the US campaign in Iraq this time. Being a long-time, faithful ally of Washington, Taiwan understands the American stance on military action. Even though Taiwan is not actually participating in the campaign, it is nevertheless willing to help contribute to the reconstruction of Iraq after the war.
One reason cited by the US for the attack is that it believes Iraq has weapons of mass destruction -- including biological and chemical weapons -- which threaten its own citizens, as well as citizens of other countries. Since Taiwan faces more than 400 Chinese missiles deployed against it, its people certainly can understand American concerns.
According to estimates by US military experts, the number of Chinese missiles aimed at Taiwan is increasing by 75 per year. Not only has Beijing refused to renounce the use of force against Taiwan, but it has also fired missiles into the seas near Taiwan in the run-up to the 1996 presidential election. If the US had not intervened then, by sending aircraft carriers to the region, the situation could have developed very differently.
At a time when global attention is focused on the US-Iraq war, we must remind countries around the world that China also possesses weapons of mass destruction. It also has the will to use military force, as well as a record of using military force. The situation in the Taiwan Strait is a time bomb.
Having lived under China's military threat for so long, Taiwan understands that it must remain vigilant against that threat. This country therefore must maintain appropriate defense capabilities to deter reckless action from Beijing.
As China increases its defense budget each year to build up its arsenal, the risk of the cross-strait situation spinning out of control will increase if Taipei does not maintain superiority in terms of weapons quality. Countries around the world should understand that appeasing China and blocking Taiwan's weapons purchases are detrimental to security in the Strait.
The US-Iraq war will cause vast casualties and devastate the lives of many people. This is a tragedy for humanity. This is a failure of the American and Iraqi leaders. It is also a failure of the UN.
Now that conflict has arrived in the Persian Gulf, we hope it will teach the world an important lesson: Countries need to review their international organizations and frameworks so that order may be restored quickly in Iraq and the rest of the world.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS