Everyone knows that the media controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) serves only the party's leaders and is a propaganda tool for the party's headquarters. The media's purpose is to rally support for the powers that be and to trumpet the greatness of the state and party leaders at every opportunity. In China, what self-determination or the right to report objectively do the media have?
Chinese Vice Premier Qian Qichen (
Qian's sophistry conceals a key reality -- that Taiwanese reporters are free to say good things about China in this country's media. They can also trumpet the CCP's "virtuous government." In contrast, Chinese reporters who come to Taiwan only look for negative news about the country and distort whatever the people do as "longing for unification, with their hearts toward the motherland." Such ludicrous writing has opened the Taiwanese people's eyes to the Xinhua News Agency reporters' extraordinary capacity for distorting news events.
Exactly whatthe positive significance of such journalistic exchanges is very much open to question. It is even difficult to tell whether these exchanges are promoting mutual understanding or increasing the misunderstandings.
But what's most intolerable for the Taiwanese has got to be Beijing's treatment of this country as a local government -- revealing its ugly "one country, two systems" mentality and giving Taiwan no space whatsoever to negotiate. Because of the Beijing's leadership's illusions of superiority, they can ignore the true thoughts and feelings of the people of Taiwan and distort anything as they want according to their political ambitions. They can create a false image of the CCP as enjoying the Chinese people's support so as to deceive their own people.
Perhaps this is why some CCP members believe that Taiwan Beer could become a propaganda tool for pro-independence Taiwanese. That was why they forced the manufacturer to change the brand name before allowing the beer into the Chinese market. Beijing has never given a thought to the fact that Tsingdao beer has been selling in this country for years without government officials fearing that its name would be a propaganda tool or asking the manufacturer to change the name. From this recent example one can see Beijing's infantile, ridiculous and thuggish attitude.
Recently the Government Information Office decided to ban the China Central Television's (CCTV) live programming from being aired here. CCTV, which has been aired here for more than a decade, is the CCP's propaganda tool. The GIO took the step after China denied broadcast applications from several Taiwanese satellite channel stations.
The GIO was right to take action and protect this country's national interests. There is no reason to put up with Beijing's unreasonable behavior. Whenever there is no equality, the government should take tougher measures and let China know clearly that Taiwan isn't another Hong Kong, nor is it subject to Beijing's whims. Otherwise we may be fostering unrealistic delusions or fantasies on the other side of the Taiwan Strait.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS