Everyone knows that the media controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) serves only the party's leaders and is a propaganda tool for the party's headquarters. The media's purpose is to rally support for the powers that be and to trumpet the greatness of the state and party leaders at every opportunity. In China, what self-determination or the right to report objectively do the media have?
Chinese Vice Premier Qian Qichen (
Qian's sophistry conceals a key reality -- that Taiwanese reporters are free to say good things about China in this country's media. They can also trumpet the CCP's "virtuous government." In contrast, Chinese reporters who come to Taiwan only look for negative news about the country and distort whatever the people do as "longing for unification, with their hearts toward the motherland." Such ludicrous writing has opened the Taiwanese people's eyes to the Xinhua News Agency reporters' extraordinary capacity for distorting news events.
Exactly whatthe positive significance of such journalistic exchanges is very much open to question. It is even difficult to tell whether these exchanges are promoting mutual understanding or increasing the misunderstandings.
But what's most intolerable for the Taiwanese has got to be Beijing's treatment of this country as a local government -- revealing its ugly "one country, two systems" mentality and giving Taiwan no space whatsoever to negotiate. Because of the Beijing's leadership's illusions of superiority, they can ignore the true thoughts and feelings of the people of Taiwan and distort anything as they want according to their political ambitions. They can create a false image of the CCP as enjoying the Chinese people's support so as to deceive their own people.
Perhaps this is why some CCP members believe that Taiwan Beer could become a propaganda tool for pro-independence Taiwanese. That was why they forced the manufacturer to change the brand name before allowing the beer into the Chinese market. Beijing has never given a thought to the fact that Tsingdao beer has been selling in this country for years without government officials fearing that its name would be a propaganda tool or asking the manufacturer to change the name. From this recent example one can see Beijing's infantile, ridiculous and thuggish attitude.
Recently the Government Information Office decided to ban the China Central Television's (CCTV) live programming from being aired here. CCTV, which has been aired here for more than a decade, is the CCP's propaganda tool. The GIO took the step after China denied broadcast applications from several Taiwanese satellite channel stations.
The GIO was right to take action and protect this country's national interests. There is no reason to put up with Beijing's unreasonable behavior. Whenever there is no equality, the government should take tougher measures and let China know clearly that Taiwan isn't another Hong Kong, nor is it subject to Beijing's whims. Otherwise we may be fostering unrealistic delusions or fantasies on the other side of the Taiwan Strait.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS