Identity awareness is crucial
The passport proposal has had a long enough gestation period. An executive decree stating the fact that the Republic of China passport is issued in Taiwan should have been already executed a year ago. As a sovereign entity, the de facto and de jure (take it to court!) ROC must act on its own with dignity and self-confidence and treat itself with respect.
There is but a year left in which to truly establish the Taiwan identity, be it a republic or a province. Election cycles will be in full force on both sides of the ironically named Pacific. This could mean that the cross-strait affair escalates into a brief, but terminal military checkmate in the midst of the oscillation between diplomatic and psychological posturing in this era of the war on terrorism. Preconditions for "negotiations" will be unnecessary at that point.
China's proposed SAR/"two systems" demotion provides no panacea economically and is entirely unworkable both politically and legally. At that point, irony may grant a less-proud version of the "two systems" changes and a generation's efforts may be reduced to a footnote in world history.
May Taiwanese quickly find themselves in front of a mirror, and with as much posture as their self-respect will allow, ask themselves: "What is my nationality?" It may be the last dignified chance for the Taiwan people to decide for themselves.
Chris Frost
New York
Why not `Taiwan Airways'?
It's about time the Taiwanese government and people are addressing the problem of the word "Taiwan" not appearing on Taiwanese passports. As an importer of many Taiwan-made products and as a frequent visitor to your country for over 30 years, I've had to cope with the North American consumer perception that the ROC is the PRC. Whenever the word "China" appears anywhere it's assumed to refer to mainland China. For years I had to ask my suppliers to omit "ROC" from all packaging material, including shipping containers, and simply show "Made In Taiwan."
But I think this is not enough. Taiwan should consider extending this practice in other areas. For example your national airline, China Airlines (CAL). Again, most of the world perceives this to be from the mainland. Why not consider a new name that is easily recognizable? I may even suggest a name, "Taiwan Airways" (TAW or TAIW). It has a nice ring to it. Surely no one could have any reasonable objection to such a change. The list of such possible changes is long and not necessary to mention here. I'm sure you understand my point.
Phil Rossi
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS