Upon hearing the proposal of PFP Legislator Tsao Yuan-jhang (
Tsao was reported as saying that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait hold common ground on the issue of the Tiaoyutai Islands. How can that possibly be? The response of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs was that the islands are part of "Chinese territory." In contrast, the position of the Taiwan government is that the islands belong to the ROC. If the Taiwan government was right, then the only way these islands could also be part of "Chinese territory" would be that both they and Taiwan are Chinese territory -- that is simply untrue.
The ROC government on Taiwan has every right to assert claims over these islands on its own without conceding with respect to the Chinese sovereignty issue. After all, historical records dating as far back as the 1500's to the more recent post-WWII era consistently indicate that these islands have always been treated as accessories to Taiwan. Their disposition was usually treated as a side dish to the disposition of Taiwan. For example, in 1895, after the first Sino-Japanese War, China had ceded both Taiwan and these islands to Japan. In 1940, a jurisdictional dispute had arisen between Taiwan, then still a Japanese colony, and Okinawa over the Tiaoyutai Islands. A Tokyo court ruled in favor of Taiwan at the time. After WWII, again Japan handed over both Taiwan and these islands to the ROC government.
Under the circumstances, the Taiwan government is fully justified in its claim that the Tiaoyutais belong to whomever has a rightful claim over Taiwan. Since the ROC on Taiwan is an independent sovereign country, the Tiaoyutai Islands are obviously part of its sovereign territory.
Reportedly, many pan-blue lawmakers are pushing the government to send troops over to these islands. This is definitely out of the question. For one, thus far, Japan has not taken any military action. It would be highly dangerous and inappropriate to escalate the situation to that level. This is not to mention the fact that any military conflict or even tension between Taiwan and Japan over these islands may just give China an excuse and the golden opportunity for military intervention followed by a military takeover of Taiwan.
It is really funny to hear to some members of the pro-unification camp saying that if no military action is taken against Japan today, tomorrow it may take it upon itself to invade Taiwan. Between China and Japan, China is by far the greater military threat. No matter how much Japan may lust for any oil deposits that may be on or near the Tiaoyutais, it cannot possibly have the slightest interest about taking over Taiwan. For one, it will first have to deal with China, which wants Taiwan for itself, and the US.
The Taiwan government is absolutely right in saying that the matter must be dealt with through diplomatic channels and means. There is no point in acting in haste. After all, Taiwan has a much bigger enemy -- China -- lurking behind its back.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS