On Monday, Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) pointed out that the two biggest challenges facing the government are sinicization and the international marginalization of Taiwan.
Lu's definition of "sinicization" encompasses more than the cultural and social aspects, because it also stresses the economic aspects. In this regard, she is definitely right.
There are those who will probably question what is the difference between "economic sinicization" and "economic integration?" Isn't economic integration precisely the core of free trade, which happens to be the goal of organizations such as the WTO?
The problem is that "integration" is the combining of parts into a larger whole. After integration takes place, something new is produced. This is different from having one part taken over or engulfed by another part, which is exactly what happens with sinicization. What is taking place across the Taiwan Strait is an "economic sinicization," rather than an "economic integration." The flow of capital, technology, know-how and manpower is almost entirely one way -- from Taiwan to China. When Taiwan's economy is sucked dry, it will collapse, while the Chinese market continues to thrive.
Moreover, all the economic integrations taking place in other parts of the world will not bring upon the participating countries the kind of destruction economic sinicization will bring to Taiwan if it is allowed to continue at the current rate -- political extinction and a sovereignty crisis. There are many reasons why economic sinicization could have a devastating impact on Taiwan.
First and foremost, China has never ceased being open and up front about its intention to take Taiwan over, even if force must be used to bring Taiwan to its knees. Many optimists believe that, despite its refusal to denounce the use of force against Taiwan, China couldn't possibly attempt a takeover because of the foreseeable devastation it would do to Taiwan's economy. After all, a rich and wealthy Taiwan could only be good for Chinese economic development, so they think. But, if the economic sinicization continues at the current rate, Taiwan will eventually lose its economic value. Will China care about any potential economic losses to Taiwan then? Even Vice President Lu has indicated that there have always been those in the Chinese military who believe that Taiwan's economy can always be rebuilt after Taiwan is united with the motherland.
Secondly, the economic sinicization over the past years has hastened the cultural and social sinicization of Taiwan, further aggravating the identity crisis in Taiwan. Now, despite all the complaints about the invasion of Western pop culture, no amount of economic integration with the West can turn such integration into a threat to the host countries' political identity. Economic sinicization can have such a unique impact on Taiwan not only because of historical cross-strait ties, but also because of the past KMT regime's education of the Taiwanese people.
As for the international marginalization of Taiwan, China of course deserves the most thanks. Not only is Taiwan the only country in the world excluded from the UN, it also continues to be an outcast from the WHO. In terms of diplomacy, Taiwan can't even make any breakthroughs in Asia, let alone other parts of the world. Not only does Taiwan not have a formal diplomatic relationship with any country in Asia, but the fact that China has reached an agreement with ASEAN members to establish the largest free-trade zone in the world can only marginalize and isolate Taiwan further.
While Lu's remarks may be on the mark, very few people in Taiwan are listening.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS