On Monday, Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) pointed out that the two biggest challenges facing the government are sinicization and the international marginalization of Taiwan.
Lu's definition of "sinicization" encompasses more than the cultural and social aspects, because it also stresses the economic aspects. In this regard, she is definitely right.
There are those who will probably question what is the difference between "economic sinicization" and "economic integration?" Isn't economic integration precisely the core of free trade, which happens to be the goal of organizations such as the WTO?
The problem is that "integration" is the combining of parts into a larger whole. After integration takes place, something new is produced. This is different from having one part taken over or engulfed by another part, which is exactly what happens with sinicization. What is taking place across the Taiwan Strait is an "economic sinicization," rather than an "economic integration." The flow of capital, technology, know-how and manpower is almost entirely one way -- from Taiwan to China. When Taiwan's economy is sucked dry, it will collapse, while the Chinese market continues to thrive.
Moreover, all the economic integrations taking place in other parts of the world will not bring upon the participating countries the kind of destruction economic sinicization will bring to Taiwan if it is allowed to continue at the current rate -- political extinction and a sovereignty crisis. There are many reasons why economic sinicization could have a devastating impact on Taiwan.
First and foremost, China has never ceased being open and up front about its intention to take Taiwan over, even if force must be used to bring Taiwan to its knees. Many optimists believe that, despite its refusal to denounce the use of force against Taiwan, China couldn't possibly attempt a takeover because of the foreseeable devastation it would do to Taiwan's economy. After all, a rich and wealthy Taiwan could only be good for Chinese economic development, so they think. But, if the economic sinicization continues at the current rate, Taiwan will eventually lose its economic value. Will China care about any potential economic losses to Taiwan then? Even Vice President Lu has indicated that there have always been those in the Chinese military who believe that Taiwan's economy can always be rebuilt after Taiwan is united with the motherland.
Secondly, the economic sinicization over the past years has hastened the cultural and social sinicization of Taiwan, further aggravating the identity crisis in Taiwan. Now, despite all the complaints about the invasion of Western pop culture, no amount of economic integration with the West can turn such integration into a threat to the host countries' political identity. Economic sinicization can have such a unique impact on Taiwan not only because of historical cross-strait ties, but also because of the past KMT regime's education of the Taiwanese people.
As for the international marginalization of Taiwan, China of course deserves the most thanks. Not only is Taiwan the only country in the world excluded from the UN, it also continues to be an outcast from the WHO. In terms of diplomacy, Taiwan can't even make any breakthroughs in Asia, let alone other parts of the world. Not only does Taiwan not have a formal diplomatic relationship with any country in Asia, but the fact that China has reached an agreement with ASEAN members to establish the largest free-trade zone in the world can only marginalize and isolate Taiwan further.
While Lu's remarks may be on the mark, very few people in Taiwan are listening.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS