The DPP's Taipei mayoral nominee Lee Ying-yuan (李應元) gave a decent performance despite the odds stacked up against him, including his tough-to-beat opponent Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and a sluggish economy for which many blaming his party. Even more noteworthy is the crisis facing the DPP -- an emerging succession gap revealed by the process through which Lee became the DPP nominee.
While Lee may have lost the election, overall he did not come out empty handed. Not only did Ma fail to garner more than one million votes, which was allegedly the number of votes he was targeting, but his winning margin was smaller than anticipated by the numerous media polls.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Ma and Lee respectively garnered around 870,000 and 470,000 votes, which rounded up to approximately 64 percent and 35 percent of the votes. These figures were roughly consistent with the DPP's own polls before the election. Lee's worst nightmare about getting only about 17 percent to 18 percent of the votes, as predicted by media polls, did not come true. Facing Ma, who is apparently able to miraculously penetrate ethnic and party lines, Lee at least managed to keep the traditional DPP supporters from drifting away.
Even more importantly, the process through which the mayoral nomination fell into Lee's lap has an entirely different impact for Lee personally and the DPP as a party. Lee was hand picked by President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) as the Taipei mayoral nominee of the DPP when no one else was willing to stand against an extremely popular Mayor Ma. Poll after poll had consistently revealed that around 70 percent of the Taipei residents were satisfied with Ma's performance. While popular satisfaction with performance in office does not necessarily translate into votes, Ma nevertheless had a virtually guaranteed victory from the beginning.
Under the circumstances, many DPP politicians who had previously indicated an intention to bid for the DPP's mayoral nomination, including lawmaker Sheng Fu-hsiung (
On the other hand, the fact that DPP was unable to produce a willing and more competitive candidate suggests a serious succession gap within the party. Where is the new generation of political stars lining up to take over the reigns of power? That is not a question to be slighted. Presumably, President Chen will run for re-election in 2004, but what about 2008?
Many people have been speculating about the impact of the Taipei and Kaohsiung mayoral elections on the 2004 presidential election. But, the correlation, if any, is probably limited. After all, unlike the presidential election at the national level, these elections are local elections. Voters have entirely different concerns.
No less interesting is the PFP's role in the elections. Facts indicate the PFP did not have the strength to play a pivotal role in either mayoral election. Of course, being the cunning politician that he is, PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) tried to get into the center of things. So, he got on his knees in public, pleading with the voters to support Ma while stopping by at Ma's rally the night before the election. Without any doubt, the kneeling act was highly inappropriate, to say the least, but it was done for a purpose. As for what that purpose may be, it is pointless to speculate.
Aggravating the situation for Soong and his party was the fact that PFP did not do well in the city councilor elections either. Under the circumstances, unless Soong can somehow convince KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) into an agreement to have Soong run as the presidential candidate jointly endorsed by the pan-blue camp, Soong risks becoming marginalized. Once that happens, the PFP will also be marginalized, since the party is essentially a one-man party. Without Soong, there is no PFP.
Unfortunately, it will be difficult for Soong to convince Lien, since the KMT gave an okay performance this time. Not only was Ma re-elected without a hitch, but the KMT's candidate Huang Jun-ying (黃俊英) gave DPP's incumbent candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) a real scare. Not to mention the fact that it would have been difficult to integrate the pan-blue for the 2004 presidential election to begin with. The same old question remains -- between Lien and Soong: Who is going to run for the presidency? Neither will want to back out be willing to serve as a sidekick. So, although everyone within the pan-blue knows too well that if they integrate, they will win, no one knows how to make that happen.
In fact, the difficulty of a pan-blue integration was also evident in the chaotic process through which Huang finally became the Kaohsiung mayoral candidate. In particular, Soong's endorsement and backing came only a few days before the election.
Under the circumstances, the interaction between the KMT and the PFP leading up to the next presidential election will interesting to observe in the days to come.
Chiu Hei-yuan (
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS