Yesterday's mayoral and council elections in Taipei and Kaohsiung have provided mixed messages for the forthcoming presidential election in early 2004. Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) won an overwhelming victory, which must propel him into consideration for the KMT presidential nomination for president.
]Ma clearly is popular with both mainlanders and northern Taiwanese voters. He is articulate in Chinese and English and meets difficult questions from the foreign and domestic press with aplomb. Furthermore, in the past few years his ability in Taiwanese has improved considerably.
But Ma's victory is not unqualified. The DPP's late nomination of Lee Ying-yuan (李應元) for the Taipei mayoralty and a lack of solidarity in Lee's campaign headquarters meant his campaign never really took off. Even so, Lee Ying-yuan still managed to obtain over 35 percent of the vote in Taipei, the notional DPP base.
Importantly, the structure of Taipei's electorate is very different from that of Taiwan as a whole. Taipei is much wealthier and has many more mainlanders than the rest of the nation.
Mayor Ma campaigned widely throughout Taiwan in last year's legislative, county executive and mayoral elections, but his support of KMT candidates did not prevent the DPP from winning in southern Taiwan. His strength in the south remains to be tested.
The DPP's victory in Kaohsiung is also not unqualified. A few weeks ago, Mayor Frank Hsieh was well ahead in the polls, but the election became much closer in recent days. Mayor Hsieh had the advantage of incumbency and his opponent, KMT nominee Huang Jun-ying, was relatively unknown. In addition, Kaohsiung is part of the DPP's southern stronghold and Mayor Hsieh should have won a strong victory.
The city council elections also left mixed messages. The KMT did marginally better than the DPP in Taipei, both in terms of seats and in proportion of the vote. The KMT won 20 seats with 38 percent of the vote, while the DPP obtained 17 seats with just under 33 percent. The PFP won eight seats with close to 15 percent of the vote.
Rising like Lazarus after last year's devastating legislative loss, the New Party won five of the six seats and 9 percent of the vote in Taipei. The TSU won no seats with less than 4 percent of the vote. Overall, this gives the so-called "pan blue" forces 33 of 52 seats, a huge majority for Mayor Ma.
In Kaohsiung, the DPP did marginally better than the KMT, winning 14 seats to the KMT's 12, though each won about one-quarter of the total vote. The PFP won seven seats with about 15 percent of the vote while the TSU won two seats with less than 5 percent.
Non-partisans won nine seats in Kaohsiung with almost 30 percent of the vote. The New Party ran only one candidate, who lost badly. Mayor Hsieh will have to win over most of the non-partisans to have a working majority in the new city council, though this new council will be better than the previous one elected in 1998.
In many ways yesterday's election resembles a midterm poll. At the time of last year's legislative election, the DPP lacked a cooperative legislature and could claim obstruction from the opposition. This time the DPP lacked excuses for the poor economic situation of Taiwan and the failure of policy towards farmers and fishermen.
The new star arising from the election must be Mayor Ma. KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and PFP Chairman James Soong(宋楚瑜) have little to cheer about. Soong had no candidate for either mayoral race and his city council candidates obtained less than 16 percent of the vote in Taipei and 15 percent of the vote in Kaohsiung. These minority shares of the vote, while useful for council coalitions, hardly form the basis for a major presidential campaign in 2004.
Lien Chan too did not particularly distinguish himself. The partial KMT success in these elections do not compensate for his weak third place in the 2000 presidential election and the poor KMT showing in last year's legislative election. Much more of the glory goes to Mayor Ma rather than Lien. While one cannot be certain, both Lien and Soong seem to be yesterday's men. Mayor Ma, on the other hand, will shine in the KMT firmament in 2008, if not in 2004.
Writing as a foreigner for an English-language newspaper in Taiwan, I would note that both DPP mayoral candidates, Lee Ying-yuan and Frank Hsieh, refused repeated requests for interviews with this and other reporters. In contrast, Mayor Ma and the three non-DPP candidates in Kaohsiung all spoke with this and other foreign reporters several times.
The DPP has strongly supported globalization in its policies. During its rise, the DPP's links with the foreign press undoubtedly provided much sympathy and support. Hopefully, the DPP has not turned inward and will revise its policy towards the foreign and English-language press by the next election.
Professor Bruce Jacobs (
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS