Yesterday's mayoral and council elections in Taipei and Kaohsiung have provided mixed messages for the forthcoming presidential election in early 2004. Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) won an overwhelming victory, which must propel him into consideration for the KMT presidential nomination for president.
]Ma clearly is popular with both mainlanders and northern Taiwanese voters. He is articulate in Chinese and English and meets difficult questions from the foreign and domestic press with aplomb. Furthermore, in the past few years his ability in Taiwanese has improved considerably.
But Ma's victory is not unqualified. The DPP's late nomination of Lee Ying-yuan (李應元) for the Taipei mayoralty and a lack of solidarity in Lee's campaign headquarters meant his campaign never really took off. Even so, Lee Ying-yuan still managed to obtain over 35 percent of the vote in Taipei, the notional DPP base.
Importantly, the structure of Taipei's electorate is very different from that of Taiwan as a whole. Taipei is much wealthier and has many more mainlanders than the rest of the nation.
Mayor Ma campaigned widely throughout Taiwan in last year's legislative, county executive and mayoral elections, but his support of KMT candidates did not prevent the DPP from winning in southern Taiwan. His strength in the south remains to be tested.
The DPP's victory in Kaohsiung is also not unqualified. A few weeks ago, Mayor Frank Hsieh was well ahead in the polls, but the election became much closer in recent days. Mayor Hsieh had the advantage of incumbency and his opponent, KMT nominee Huang Jun-ying, was relatively unknown. In addition, Kaohsiung is part of the DPP's southern stronghold and Mayor Hsieh should have won a strong victory.
The city council elections also left mixed messages. The KMT did marginally better than the DPP in Taipei, both in terms of seats and in proportion of the vote. The KMT won 20 seats with 38 percent of the vote, while the DPP obtained 17 seats with just under 33 percent. The PFP won eight seats with close to 15 percent of the vote.
Rising like Lazarus after last year's devastating legislative loss, the New Party won five of the six seats and 9 percent of the vote in Taipei. The TSU won no seats with less than 4 percent of the vote. Overall, this gives the so-called "pan blue" forces 33 of 52 seats, a huge majority for Mayor Ma.
In Kaohsiung, the DPP did marginally better than the KMT, winning 14 seats to the KMT's 12, though each won about one-quarter of the total vote. The PFP won seven seats with about 15 percent of the vote while the TSU won two seats with less than 5 percent.
Non-partisans won nine seats in Kaohsiung with almost 30 percent of the vote. The New Party ran only one candidate, who lost badly. Mayor Hsieh will have to win over most of the non-partisans to have a working majority in the new city council, though this new council will be better than the previous one elected in 1998.
In many ways yesterday's election resembles a midterm poll. At the time of last year's legislative election, the DPP lacked a cooperative legislature and could claim obstruction from the opposition. This time the DPP lacked excuses for the poor economic situation of Taiwan and the failure of policy towards farmers and fishermen.
The new star arising from the election must be Mayor Ma. KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and PFP Chairman James Soong(宋楚瑜) have little to cheer about. Soong had no candidate for either mayoral race and his city council candidates obtained less than 16 percent of the vote in Taipei and 15 percent of the vote in Kaohsiung. These minority shares of the vote, while useful for council coalitions, hardly form the basis for a major presidential campaign in 2004.
Lien Chan too did not particularly distinguish himself. The partial KMT success in these elections do not compensate for his weak third place in the 2000 presidential election and the poor KMT showing in last year's legislative election. Much more of the glory goes to Mayor Ma rather than Lien. While one cannot be certain, both Lien and Soong seem to be yesterday's men. Mayor Ma, on the other hand, will shine in the KMT firmament in 2008, if not in 2004.
Writing as a foreigner for an English-language newspaper in Taiwan, I would note that both DPP mayoral candidates, Lee Ying-yuan and Frank Hsieh, refused repeated requests for interviews with this and other reporters. In contrast, Mayor Ma and the three non-DPP candidates in Kaohsiung all spoke with this and other foreign reporters several times.
The DPP has strongly supported globalization in its policies. During its rise, the DPP's links with the foreign press undoubtedly provided much sympathy and support. Hopefully, the DPP has not turned inward and will revise its policy towards the foreign and English-language press by the next election.
Professor Bruce Jacobs (
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS