Lee Teng-hui (
Lee's travel plans are sensitive because he is a former president and because he stands for Taiwan's independent sovereignty. He defined cross-strait relations as "special state-to-state" in nature and refused to accept Beijing's "one country, two sys-tems" formula. Beijing hates Lee with a passion. The fact that Lee's travels will bring the voice of the people of Taiwan to the international community irks Beijing no end.
Lee's last trip to Japan in April last year was made for medical reasons -- although he managed to get quite a bit of sightseeing in as well. Despite intense pressure from Beijing, then prime minister Yoshiro Mori agreed to approve Lee's visa application. Lee went to Japan as an ordinary citizen of Taiwan and got a chance to view the cherry blossoms.
Despite his low-profile approach, he was welcomed by the Japanese public, many of whose members see in him the archetypal Japanese spirit that they rarely come across in their own country. Lee's writings and biographies are hugely popular in Japan, where the public are curious about a man who has been Japanese, Chinese and Taiwanese at different periods of his life and who appears to have integrated into his personality Japanese, Chinese and Western education. His political and economic achievements as a president also spark interest. The affinity shown by ordinary Japanese toward Lee has further deepened Beijing's hostility.
While Taiwan and Japan do not have diplomatic relations they certainly have very close trade, political and security ties. Interaction in the private sector also runs deep. Lee's visa application should be a simple matter.
As an ordinary citizen Lee poses no security threat to Japan and has a legitimate reason to visit. He abided by the terms Tokyo laid out for his previous visit and did not do anything to make the Japanese government unhappy. Japan is fully justified in issuing him a visa. The only stumbling block is Beijing's attitude.
But issuing a visa is about Japan's exercise of its own sovereignty. Should Tokyo worry about what Beijing thinks? After all, nothing really happened after Tokyo offended Beijing by giving Lee a visa last year. Would China really forgive Tokyo's earlier "lapse" if it were to reject a second visa application? Only by issuing Lee a visa for a short, private visit can Japan truly exercise its sovereignty and prove that it suffers no Sino-phobia.
Without harassment from the pro-China faction, Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi should be able to view Lee's matter for what it is -- a visa application from a private -- if not exactly ordinary -- citizen.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS