Lee Teng-hui (
Lee's travel plans are sensitive because he is a former president and because he stands for Taiwan's independent sovereignty. He defined cross-strait relations as "special state-to-state" in nature and refused to accept Beijing's "one country, two sys-tems" formula. Beijing hates Lee with a passion. The fact that Lee's travels will bring the voice of the people of Taiwan to the international community irks Beijing no end.
Lee's last trip to Japan in April last year was made for medical reasons -- although he managed to get quite a bit of sightseeing in as well. Despite intense pressure from Beijing, then prime minister Yoshiro Mori agreed to approve Lee's visa application. Lee went to Japan as an ordinary citizen of Taiwan and got a chance to view the cherry blossoms.
Despite his low-profile approach, he was welcomed by the Japanese public, many of whose members see in him the archetypal Japanese spirit that they rarely come across in their own country. Lee's writings and biographies are hugely popular in Japan, where the public are curious about a man who has been Japanese, Chinese and Taiwanese at different periods of his life and who appears to have integrated into his personality Japanese, Chinese and Western education. His political and economic achievements as a president also spark interest. The affinity shown by ordinary Japanese toward Lee has further deepened Beijing's hostility.
While Taiwan and Japan do not have diplomatic relations they certainly have very close trade, political and security ties. Interaction in the private sector also runs deep. Lee's visa application should be a simple matter.
As an ordinary citizen Lee poses no security threat to Japan and has a legitimate reason to visit. He abided by the terms Tokyo laid out for his previous visit and did not do anything to make the Japanese government unhappy. Japan is fully justified in issuing him a visa. The only stumbling block is Beijing's attitude.
But issuing a visa is about Japan's exercise of its own sovereignty. Should Tokyo worry about what Beijing thinks? After all, nothing really happened after Tokyo offended Beijing by giving Lee a visa last year. Would China really forgive Tokyo's earlier "lapse" if it were to reject a second visa application? Only by issuing Lee a visa for a short, private visit can Japan truly exercise its sovereignty and prove that it suffers no Sino-phobia.
Without harassment from the pro-China faction, Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi should be able to view Lee's matter for what it is -- a visa application from a private -- if not exactly ordinary -- citizen.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing