The debate in the media and in the legislature on the problem of direct links between China and Taiwan took off when Jiang Zemin (江澤民) began to use the international media to put his spin on the issue before visiting the US last month and it has continued up to the recent opening of the CCP's 16th National Congress. Viewing the matter solely from the perspective of reports promoting direct links in unificationist media, one could get the mistaken impression that all Taiwanese are heedless of their own security and support their immediate implementation.
Even the view presented on Thursday by the Ministry of National Defense (MND) opposing the use of Taipei's Sungshan Airport as a service point for direct air links has been severely criticized by unificationist media and legislators. They have repeatedly argued in China's defense, saying that modern warfare doesn't require surprise attacks by fighter aircraft -- comments which mock the military preparations and strategic planning of the MND.
If the use of the capital city's airport is not man-aged appropriately, key targets will be left highly vulnerable. The crux of the matter is that no buffer region surrounds the Sungshan airport in the case of a sudden military attack. An airplane could veer over to the Presidential Office in 50 seconds. All actions to prevent the enemy from advancing an attack would take place in downtown Taipei.
Actually, there is no need for the MND to conjecture that China will launch a surprise attack on Taiwan. As long as the unificationist media and certain elected officials continue to serve as China's mouthpieces there will be no need for China to waste a single soldier forcing Taiwan's capitulation. The real threat to national security stems from the unificationist media creating a false impression of security and causing the nation to lower its guard.
We must admit that any plans for direct links will only benefit a small minority. This includes the less than two percent of the population with business dealings in China and as well as mainlanders who might wish to return to China to visit relatives. This latter group accounts for 13 percent of the population, with the number making regular trips back and forth amounting to less than two percent. Regardless of how it is done, opening the door to direct links just to meet the demands of these minority groups while sacrificing the safety and financial security of the majority is not the action of a responsible government.
This is why we support the government's point of view on cross-strait related issues: national security must come first. How can Taiwan possibly drop its guard when China still sees Taiwan as its main potential enemy and has 400 missiles deployed along its southern coastline?
On Friday, President Chen Shui-bian (
If the unificationist media continues to mislead public opinion, we suggest that the direct links issue be decided according to democratic principles, in a referendum. We cannot sacrifice the safety of over 95 percent of the people of Taiwan for the convenience of a minority of less than five percent.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS