The debate in the media and in the legislature on the problem of direct links between China and Taiwan took off when Jiang Zemin (江澤民) began to use the international media to put his spin on the issue before visiting the US last month and it has continued up to the recent opening of the CCP's 16th National Congress. Viewing the matter solely from the perspective of reports promoting direct links in unificationist media, one could get the mistaken impression that all Taiwanese are heedless of their own security and support their immediate implementation.
Even the view presented on Thursday by the Ministry of National Defense (MND) opposing the use of Taipei's Sungshan Airport as a service point for direct air links has been severely criticized by unificationist media and legislators. They have repeatedly argued in China's defense, saying that modern warfare doesn't require surprise attacks by fighter aircraft -- comments which mock the military preparations and strategic planning of the MND.
If the use of the capital city's airport is not man-aged appropriately, key targets will be left highly vulnerable. The crux of the matter is that no buffer region surrounds the Sungshan airport in the case of a sudden military attack. An airplane could veer over to the Presidential Office in 50 seconds. All actions to prevent the enemy from advancing an attack would take place in downtown Taipei.
Actually, there is no need for the MND to conjecture that China will launch a surprise attack on Taiwan. As long as the unificationist media and certain elected officials continue to serve as China's mouthpieces there will be no need for China to waste a single soldier forcing Taiwan's capitulation. The real threat to national security stems from the unificationist media creating a false impression of security and causing the nation to lower its guard.
We must admit that any plans for direct links will only benefit a small minority. This includes the less than two percent of the population with business dealings in China and as well as mainlanders who might wish to return to China to visit relatives. This latter group accounts for 13 percent of the population, with the number making regular trips back and forth amounting to less than two percent. Regardless of how it is done, opening the door to direct links just to meet the demands of these minority groups while sacrificing the safety and financial security of the majority is not the action of a responsible government.
This is why we support the government's point of view on cross-strait related issues: national security must come first. How can Taiwan possibly drop its guard when China still sees Taiwan as its main potential enemy and has 400 missiles deployed along its southern coastline?
On Friday, President Chen Shui-bian (
If the unificationist media continues to mislead public opinion, we suggest that the direct links issue be decided according to democratic principles, in a referendum. We cannot sacrifice the safety of over 95 percent of the people of Taiwan for the convenience of a minority of less than five percent.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS