Fri, Jan 17, 2020 page10

• European firms cut from Belt and Road Initiative

  • Bloomberg
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  European companies have been largely excluded from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) due to the dominant role of China’s state-owned enterprises and opaque bidding processes, a survey said, raising questions about the nation’s commitment to opening the program to the world.

  A small number of European companies in China are involved in BRI, the EU Chamber of Commerce in China said in a survey of its members released yesterday in Beijing, with transparency topping the list of challenges European companies face.

  A slightly larger number of European companies have seen positive knock-on effects through access to new logistics options and increased trade flows with countries hosting projects, it said.

  “One of the most notable aspects about BRI-related projects is that they are rarely transparent,” the report said, adding that the businesses had come up against challenges to participation since the program’s inception.

  Given the initiative’s scale, most respondents referred to their level of involvement as “crumbs from the table,” the report said.

  Of 132 respondents to the chamber’s survey, just 20 indicated they had bid on at least one BRI-related project, with seven bidding as direct contractors and 13 as subcontractors.

  Most of them participated after being pulled in by Chinese business partners or the government. All but a scant few have played niche roles, such as providing certain technology, it said.

  More than half of respondents said there was insufficient information available to European companies seeking to make bids, and nearly 40 percent said that procurement systems for BRI-related projects were not transparent enough.

  “China’s colossal national champions — boosted by state aid and cheap financing — are securing an unusually large proportion of contracts when compared to multilateral development schemes,” chamber president Joerg Wuttke said. “Europe needs to determine how to respond to this export of the China model to shield itself from market distortions and stay competitive in third-country markets.”

  Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Geng Shuang (耿爽) said that Chinese and foreign companies participating in the BRI followed market rules “based on the principle of fairness.”

  “They participate in specific projects in an open and transparent way. The bidding process is transparent,” Geng told reporters in Beijing. “Whether companies participate or not is entirely companies’ own choice.”

  The report comes as BRI has attempted to clean up its image after criticism that it is a debt trap for poor countries and allegations of corruption.

  While it has advocated for the program to be more open, the chamber said it was not yet an inclusive, open global initiative.

  Improving the quality of the projects is critical to “prevent ‘promise fatigue’ from once again becoming endemic in the international community,” it said.

  The Chinese government clearly took note of some negative perceptions of the BRI during the initiative’s first half decade and “took corrective action,” the report said.

  About a quarter of respondents indicated that the BRI was changing, trending toward improvement rather than worsening across various aspects of the initiative.

  Italy became the first G7 nation to sign up for BRI in March last year.

  As of June last year, China had established third-party market cooperation mechanisms with 14 developed countries, including France and Japan.

  Third-party market cooperation — signing up a developed nation to help build infrastructure in Belt and Road countries — is the focus of the next phase of BRI to depoliticize the project and bring in more stakeholders, Bloomberg reported.

  The BRI cooperation paper is chiefly a political declaration by two governments, Wuttke said.

  In terms of business, “it has yet to produce any new opportunities for that country’s companies, and hasn’t driven the openness, transparency and accountability that we enjoy in multilateral finance schemes or schemes run by OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] member countries like Japan,” he said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Taiwanese lose status after obtaining single-use Chinese passport

  • 2

    KMT chair to meet with Xi, but at a price: source

  • 3

    Deterring Taiwan conflict a priority: US

  • 4

    Taiwanese tourists go viral in video during Japan quake

  • 5

    US vows deterrence ‘through strength’