The US’ for-profit college industry is collapsing. The Chronicle of Higher Education has reported that in the past five years, more than 1,200 college campuses have been closed — an average of about 20 every month. Of those that shut, 88 percent were for-profit and their students amounted to 85 percent of those affected by the closures.
Enrollment at four-year for-profit colleges is in free fall, dropping 13.7 percent from fall 2014 to fall 2015, 14.5 percent the following year and 7.1 percent the year after that.
Perhaps the only surprising thing was that it took this long. For-profit colleges have long been plagued by poor performance — a 2012 study by economists Kevin Lang and Russell Weinstein found no earnings premium from attending a for-profit university. Follow-up studies yielded similar results.
However, the price tag for these colleges was high and students were encouraged to take out lots of loans to pay it. The inevitable result was a generation of for-profit college students with poor employment prospects and a mountain of debt.
Meanwhile, a whiff of dubious marketing hung about the industry, with DeVry University being forced to pay a US$100 million settlement for misleading prospective students about the economic benefits of attending.
The winnowing of the for-profit college industry shows that although it can take years for poor quality and high prices to reduce demand in the education sector, eventually it does happen.
Fortunately, for-profits only account for a relatively small slice of undergraduate education — perhaps about one-10th. The more important question is whether the carnage among for-profits is a harbinger of similar declines for non-profit and public colleges.
Enrollment at four-year public and nonprofit colleges has remained essentially unchanged during the past two years. College enrollment rates overall — which include the big decline in for-profits and a smaller decline in two-year public schools — are essentially constant since 2005.
However, this conceals some potentially important underlying trends. Hispanic enrollment rates are up since 2010, but white and black enrollment rates have dropped a bit.
Meanwhile, tuition might be falling at four-year public and nonprofit universities — another potential sign of weakening demand.
If demand for college were weakening, this is probably how it would manifest itself. The number of spots at good schools is rationed by the application process — these schools limit their enrollment to maintain their prestige.
So falling demand would reduce prices for these colleges, but not the number of people attending.
Meanwhile, enrollment would fall at institutions that were less in demand, such as for-profits and two-year colleges.
Why might demand for college be weakening? One reason is that there are simply fewer young people in the US these days. The reversal of Mexican immigration probably has something to do with that.
Falling fertility rates would do even more to thin out the ranks of the young in the decades to come.
US universities could make up the difference by allowing in more international students, but US President Donald Trump’s anti-immigration policies and attitudes have made that difficult — enrollment from overseas is now in decline.
The strengthening labor market might also be pulling a few young Americans away from college, although so far that trend seems to be very slight.
Another possible factor is that prospective college students might be learning to distinguish between the economic opportunities afforded by various college majors.
Overall, the earnings premium for a bachelor’s degree has remained constant or continued to rise, depending on how it is measured.
However, those overall numbers conceal large differences by field of study and unemployment rates also differ greatly between majors. This might be why college students are avoiding humanities majors.
However, it could also mean that some prospective college students who do not want to major in fields like science, technology, engineering, math, health or business might avoid college entirely, or be unwilling to attend more expensive schools.
Whatever the reason, if the decline in demand for college continues, it could be bad for many regions of the US. For more prestigious universities, falling undergraduate applications need not crush their plans for expansion.
Most of the local economic benefit of a university comes from research, not from education.
However, a number of small towns owe their economic health to modest local colleges whose main activity is teaching; if these shrink or disappear due to falling college demand, the trend of local economic decline could accelerate.
Government programs to make college more affordable for lower-income Americans can help prop up enrollment in these vulnerable areas.
However, universities also need to help by cutting costs. Addressing administrative bloat and other sources of inefficiency will allow public and nonprofit colleges to make enrollment a more attractive proposition.
Noah Smith is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He was an assistant professor of finance at Stony Brook University and he blogs at Noahpinion.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
China has claimed a breakthrough in developing homegrown chipmaking equipment, an important step in overcoming US sanctions designed to thwart Beijing’s semiconductor goals. State-linked organizations are advised to use a new laser-based immersion lithography machine with a resolution of 65 nanometers or better, the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) said in an announcement this month. Although the note does not specify the supplier, the spec marks a significant step up from the previous most advanced indigenous equipment — developed by Shanghai Micro Electronics Equipment Group Co (SMEE, 上海微電子) — which stood at about 90 nanometers. MIIT’s claimed advances last
ISSUES: Gogoro has been struggling with ballooning losses and was recently embroiled in alleged subsidy fraud, using Chinese-made components instead of locally made parts Gogoro Inc (睿能創意), the nation’s biggest electric scooter maker, yesterday said that its chairman and CEO Horace Luke (陸學森) has resigned amid chronic losses and probes into the company’s alleged involvement in subsidy fraud. The board of directors nominated Reuntex Group (潤泰集團) general counsel Tamon Tseng (曾夢達) as the company’s new chairman, Gogoro said in a statement. Ruentex is Gogoro’s biggest stakeholder. Gogoro Taiwan general manager Henry Chiang (姜家煒) is to serve as acting CEO during the interim period, the statement said. Luke’s departure came as a bombshell yesterday. As a company founder, he has played a key role in pushing for the
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) has appointed Rose Castanares, executive vice president of TSMC Arizona, as president of the subsidiary, which is responsible for carrying out massive investments by the Taiwanese tech giant in the US state, the company said in a statement yesterday. Castanares will succeed Brian Harrison as president of the Arizona subsidiary on Oct. 1 after the incumbent president steps down from the position with a transfer to the Arizona CEO office to serve as an advisor to TSMC Arizona’s chairman, the statement said. According to TSMC, Harrison is scheduled to retire on Dec. 31. Castanares joined TSMC in
EUROPE ON HOLD: Among a flurry of announcements, Intel said it would postpone new factories in Germany and Poland, but remains committed to its US expansion Intel Corp chief executive officer Pat Gelsinger has landed Amazon.com Inc’s Amazon Web Services (AWS) as a customer for the company’s manufacturing business, potentially bringing work to new plants under construction in the US and boosting his efforts to turn around the embattled chipmaker. Intel and AWS are to coinvest in a custom semiconductor for artificial intelligence computing — what is known as a fabric chip — in a “multiyear, multibillion-dollar framework,” Intel said in a statement on Monday. The work would rely on Intel’s 18A process, an advanced chipmaking technology. Intel shares rose more than 8 percent in late trading after the