Central banks should accept that reversing crisis-era monetary policy will be “bumpy” and should not delay doing so just for fear of upsetting financial markets, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) said.
Claudio Borio, who heads the institution’s economics department, urged policy makers to press ahead, both to address financial stability risks and to insulate their economies against the next downturn.
The BIS is effectively a bank for central banks.
“We need to normalize policy and we need to do so with a steady hand,” he said in an interview accompanying the publication of the BIS Annual Report.
“By steady hand I mean, in particular, not being afraid of increases in volatility as long as they remain contained: given the initial conditions, volatility spikes are likely to occur along the way,” he added.
The remarks from Borio, who is known for steering against mainstream thinking, come as the world’s major monetary authorities edge toward more normal policy settings at wildly different paces.
The US Federal Reserve has raised interest rates seven times since late 2015, the Bank of England once, and the European Central Bank (ECB) has only just announced it will stop bond buying this year, with no rate hikes until after summer next year. The Bank of Japan is still adding stimulus.
Borio’s view contrasts with comments a week ago by former US secretary of the Treasury Lawrence Summers, who said central banks should be wary of raising interest rates just to control inflation.
In a speech at an ECB conference in Portugal, where he noted his differences with the BIS, Summers said the consequences of another recession any time soon would “massively exceed” the problems of prices running slightly hot.
After venturing into uncharted terrain with trillions of dollars of stimulus — and in some cases sub-zero interest rates — to fight the global financial crisis, central banks are in another uncertain situation as they go into reverse.
One flashpoint this year was the surge in US yields and spike in volatility in February, sparked by concerns about inflation and faster Fed tightening.
The BIS has previously warned about froth in markets from excessive valuations.
For Borio, as long as bouts of volatility are contained, they should not block the path to the exit.
“It is important not to become distracted from the normalization path as long as those wobbles remain contained and don’t have an impact on the real economy,” he said.
Borio has previously questioned the evidence for Summers’ theory of secular stagnation, in which the economy is in a protracted phase of weak growth that would explain low interest rates.
The BIS economist has called for an overhaul of thinking on inflation and interest rate-setting in the wake of globalization and digitalization, saying the ability of central banks to fine-tune inflation may have been overestimated.
The BIS, under new leadership since Agustin Carstens became general manager in December last year, did acknowledge a “delicate balance” between moving too slowly and too fast.
It even noted reasons to support a “very patient strategy,” including high global debt levels and questions over how economies will actually respond to the end of ultra-low rates.
“The fragility that we see today, on the financial side in particular, is to a considerable extent the result of an economic recovery that has been far too dependent on central banks,” Borio said.
“That’s why going forward we need a change in the policy mix,” he said.
The EU and US are nearing an agreement to coordinate on producing and securing critical minerals, part of a push to break reliance on Chinese supplies. The potential deal would create incentives, such as minimum prices, that could advantage non-Chinese suppliers, according to a draft of an “action plan” seen by Bloomberg. The EU and US would also cooperate on standards, investments and joint projects, as well as coordinate on any supply disruptions by countries like China. The two sides are additionally seeking other “like-minded partners” to join a multicountry accord to help create these new critical mineral supply chains, which feed into
For weeks now, the global tech industry has been waiting for a major artificial intelligence (AI) launch from DeepSeek (深度求索), seen as a benchmark for China’s progress in the fast-moving field. More than a year has passed since the start-up put Chinese AI on the map in early last year with a low-cost chatbot that performed at a similar level to US rivals. However, despite reports and rumors about its imminent release, DeepSeek’s next-generation “V4” model is nowhere in sight. Speculation is also swirling over the geopolitical implications of which computer chips were chosen to train and power the new
Elon Musk’s lieutenants have reached out to chip industry suppliers, including Applied Materials Inc, Tokyo Electron Ltd and Lam Research Corp, for his envisioned Terafab, early steps in an audacious and likely arduous attempt to break into the production of cutting-edge chips. Staff working for the joint venture between Tesla Inc and Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) have sought price quotes and delivery times for an array of chipmaking gear, people familiar with the matter said. In past weeks, they’ve contacted makers of photomasks, substrates, etchers, depositors, cleaning devices, testers and other tools, according to the people, who asked not to
Japan approved ¥631.5 billion (US$3.97 billion) in additional subsidies to hasten Rapidus Corp’s entry into the high-stakes artificial intelligence (AI) chipmaking arena, ramping up support for a project widely regarded as a long shot. The capital is intended to bankroll Rapidus’ work for information technology firm Fujitsu Ltd, one of the initial customers that Tokyo hopes would get the signature endeavor off the ground. The new money raises the fees and investments that the government is injecting into the start-up to ¥2.6 trillion by the end of the current fiscal year to March next year, the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and