One year ago, Micromax Informatics Ltd vaulted past Samsung Electronics Co to become India’s leading smartphone brand. Today, its market share has nearly halved, several top executives have resigned and the company is looking for growth outside India.
In Micromax’s slide to second place is a tale of the promise and peril of India’s booming, but hypercompetitive smartphone industry.
India is the world’s fastest-growing smartphone market. Shipments of smartphones jumped 29 percent to 103 million units last year.
Rapid growth has helped nurture a crop of local brands, led by Micromax, that outsourced production to Chinese manufacturers. Now, as Samsung rolls out more affordable mobile phones, the same Chinese factories are entering the Indian market with their own brands, depressing prices and forcing Indian mobile phone makers to rethink their strategies.
“What the Indian brands did to the global brands two years ago, Chinese phone makers are doing the same to Indian brands now, and over the next year we see tremendous competition for Micromax and other Indian smartphone makers,” Counterpoint Research analyst Tarun Pathak said.
Micromax, which was founded in New Delhi by four partners in 2000, but only began selling mobile phones in 2008, built its market share by working with Chinese manufacturers such as Coolpad Group Ltd (酷派), Gionee Communication Equipment Co (金立) and Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp (歐珀移動) to offer affordable mobile phones quickly. Last year, it launched more than 40 new models.
In 2014, the founders brought in outside managers to lead the company at a time when Micromax was challenging Samsung to become the largest mobile phone maker in India.
However, tensions arose soon after between founders and the newly hired executives, six former executives told Reuters. These conflicts undermined Micromax’s attempts to raise funds for expansion, former executives said.
In May last year, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (阿里巴巴) walked away from a mooted US$1.2 billion purchase of a 20 percent stake, citing a lack of clarity on growth plans, according to one executive involved in the discussion.
Micromax cofounder Vikas Jain said in an interview with media this week that the company and Alibaba disagreed on a future roadmap.
Alibaba declined to comment.
Former executives said the lack of fresh funding undermined a proposal by the new executives to move Micromax’s research and design operations, which had previously been outsourced, in-house. The move was intended to help Micromax differentiate itself from generic Android clones.
“We hired about 80 to 90 people in Bangalore to do in-house software and design, but with no money from the investors and little interest from the founders, that team fizzled away and that office has been partially shut down now,” a former executive said.
After Alibaba walked away, Micromax struggled to attract other investors who would have been key to Micromax’s plan to invest in software research and development and hardware design. The company was forced to scale down the in-house research and development project, a top executive involved in the fundraising plan said.
At least five senior executives have resigned since November last year. The latest was Vineet Taneja, chief executive since 2014, who quit last week.
Meanwhile, Chinese handset makers, including Coolpad and Oppo, to which Micromax outsources its manufacturing, were sharpening their focus on India. Samsung, too, began to introduce more affordable models there.
Last year, Chinese brands doubled their market share to 18 percent, Counterpoint Research said, taking away business from Indian budget mobile phone makers, such as Micromax, Intex Technologies Ltd, Lava International Ltd and Karbonn Mobiles. Indian brands’ market share fell from 48 percent to 43 percent last year.
“Right now the whole industry is suffering because of the Chinese phones,” Jain said. “We have seen large write-downs happening on inventory in China and that inventory is being passed on to India at a markdown.”
Chinese mobile phone makers including LeEco (樂視), Xiaomi Corp (小米) and Lenovo Group Ltd (聯想) have also partnered with e-commerce companies including Amazon India and Flipkart to sell mobile phones directly to consumers, saving on distribution and sales and reaching new online shoppers directly.
In the final quarter of last year, Micromax’s shipments fell by 12.1 percent, against growth of 15.4 percent for the sector, according to industry tracker International Data Corp (IDC). Micromax’s share of the smartphone market fell to 13 percent in the fourth quarter from 22 percent at its peak in 2014, IDC said.
Micromax, which is privately held and does not disclose financial information, maintains it is profitable. Founders Jain, Rahul Sharma, Rajesh Agarwal and Sumeet Arora still control about 80 percent of the company. They have raised nearly US$90 million from investors in the last five years.
Facing competition from both Samsung and inexpensive Chinese mobile phones, Micromax plans to increase production in India. Jain said that the company plans to double local manufacturing output from 1.5 million units to about 3 million units a month over the next six to 12 months.
Already a top-10 brand in Russia, Micromax is seeking a partner to help it expand further outside India and diversify into televisions and tablets.
“Micromax needs to diversify geographically and also needs to diversify product lines,” said Neil Mawston, executive director of the global wireless practice at London-based research consultancy Strategy Analytics.
How well it manages that diversification will be key, Mawston said.
After several years flying high as Asia’s best Nvidia Corp proxy, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is increasingly vying with other artificial intelligence (AI) stocks for investor attention. Stock traders are chasing a wider array of beneficiaries as mainstream usage of AI creates demand for hardware beyond the most-advanced chips TSMC makes for Nvidia. Subthemes from the deepening memory crunch to advances in robotics are also luring bids. At the same time, investment caps on single stocks are pushing funds to diversify, while retail investors long familiar with TSMC through its US depositary receipts are being offered a broader set of
UNDER MICROSCOPE: Taiwan detained three people who allegedly conspired to buy servers in Taiwan and export them using fraudulent documentation, prosecutors said Nvidia Corp chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) on Saturday urged Super Micro Computer Inc to tighten up on compliance after Taiwan detained three people this week for allegedly making fraudulent declarations about artificial intelligence (AI) servers made by its US partner. The development marked the nation’s first crackdown on semiconductor smuggling, which grew after the US slapped restrictions on exports of high-end chips such as Nvidia AI accelerators to China. Nvidia is “rigorous” in explaining regulations to all of its partners, Huang told reporters after arriving in Taipei. “Ultimately Super Micro has to run their own company,” he said in response to
TECH RELIANCE: Growth is increasingly reflecting an unequal K-shaped distribution, where technology sectors outperform and other industries struggle, an expert said Standard Chartered Bank has significantly raised its forecast for Taiwan’s economic growth to 9.5 percent this year, up from 7.6 percent previously, citing surging artificial intelligence (AI) demand driving exports, semiconductor production and investment. The upgrade reflects a sustained AI supercycle that continues to fuel demand for advanced chips and technology infrastructure, which form the backbone of Taiwan’s exports, the bank said in a report this week. “We raise our 2026 growth forecast to reflect a much stronger-than-expected first-quarter GDP figure,” Standard Chartered senior economist for greater China and Asia Tommy Wu (胡東安) said in the report. Driven largely by a 35.3 percent
Two of Taiwan’s international carriers, Starlux Airlines Co (星宇航空) and EVA Airways Corp (長榮航空), have retained the five-star airline rating awarded by international airline review organization Skytrax. Starlux was awarded the distinction for a second consecutive year, while EVA Air received it for the 11th straight year, Skytrax said in statements released yesterday and on Thursday last week, respectively. The five-star rating is considered one of the airline industry's highest honors and is awarded following professional audits of airline product and frontline service standards, Skytrax said. The ratings are based on in-depth assessments using unified global quality standards rather than customer review scores
RSS