Kim Sbarcea knew exactly what she wanted. She typed “Tiffany Elsa Peretti mesh earrings” into Google and chanced upon a pair of the US$450 earrings for — deal of deals — US$32.
The Web site, called tiffany-outletsale.com, looked legit. She hit the buy button.
In that instant, Sbarcea’s money was sucked from her house in Christchurch, New Zealand, into the global counterfeiting market, where Chinese banks have emerged as key conduits in an illegal industry estimated to be worth US$1.8 trillion this year.
At least three prominent Chinese banks serve as safe havens for counterfeiters, who use them to process credit card payments or move their money around the globe, The Associated Press has found.
A review of hundreds of pages of court documents — along with interviews with lawyers, investigators, government officials and industry groups — shows that a lack of legal cooperation between the West and China is allowing counterfeiters to use Chinese banks as financial shelters.
Five lawsuits filed in the US against counterfeiters reveal a pattern: Counterfeiters sold fakes online in the US, using credit cards or PayPal. Then, records show, they transferred millions to accounts at two of China’s largest, state-owned banks — the Bank of China (中國銀行) and the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC, 中國工商銀行) — as well as China Merchants Bank (招商銀行).
The banks do not dispute that the accused counterfeiters held accounts, but refuse to comply with US court orders to freeze funds or disclose information about accounts in China, saying that would violate bank secrecy laws. The banks said they are committed to fighting counterfeiting, have broken no laws, and are caught in a jurisdictional dispute between China and the US.
In a 2013 letter, the Chinese embassy in Washington complained to the US Department of State about subpoenas served “time and again” on Chinese banks.
The embassy wrote that demands to freeze assets and disclose information about accounts in China amounted to “wrongful acts that disrespect China’s sovereignty and laws.”
Chinese regulators later warned that the issue could “undermine” Chinese-US relations.
In one of two lawsuits, Tiffany & Co seeks US$58.5 million in damages in a New York federal court from an online counterfeiting ring that spans three continents.
Tiffany said it traced PayPal transfers to Bank of China (BOC), ICBC and China Merchants Bank accounts, and also found that the Bank of China was processing credit card payments for one defendant.
A Latvian bank handed over details about the illicit money flows, but the Bank of China refused to cooperate, US court documents show.
Gucci Group NV is seeking US$12 million in damages in a New York federal court from a counterfeiting ring it said sold millions worth of fake handbags and wallets to US consumers. Using records provided by JPMorgan & Chase Co, Gucci traced US$530,000 in transfers from counterfeiters in the US to Bank of China accounts.
However, the Bank of China refused to freeze those funds for Gucci. Instead, it secretly froze more than US$890,000 of the accused counterfeiters’ money to cover its own legal costs, Chinese court documents show.
The other two lawsuits were filed by the US Department of Justice, which traced millions in online sales of counterfeit sports jerseys to Bank of China and ICBC.
More than 90 percent of the banks used by online counterfeiters to process credit card payments are Chinese, according to the International Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition, a non-profit industry group whose members include Apple Inc, Procter & Gamble Co and Tiffany & Co.
The coalition said it has helped shut down more than 4,900 accounts used to process payments for 200,000 Web sites selling counterfeit goods since 2012.
Its records of account closures show the Bank of China and two other state-controlled banking giants — the Bank of Communications (交通銀行) and the Agricultural Bank of China (中國農業銀行) — processing payments for counterfeiters.
“We have to find better ways of gathering evidence,’’ said Mark Cohen, a former intellectual property attache at the US embassy in Beijing.
In the past, Chinese banks have sometimes disclosed information in response to US lawsuits. The value of that information is clear: Lawyers, using transaction information from a Shanghai account obtained on the order of a New York court, cracked a network that shipped dangerous counterfeit blood glucose test kits for diabetics to 600 US pharmacies.
Now, however, banks are tightening enforcement of secrecy rules, in part because China’s consumer protection law was broadened in 2010, China University of Political Science and Law associate professor Zheng Junguo (鄭俊果) said.
The US also restricts access to financial information, but allows judges to order disclosure for lawsuits anywhere in the world. The UK, Hong Kong and Singapore have similar provisions that can be used to fight transnational crime.
The only legal ways to get information about Chinese bank accounts are to file a lawsuit in China or make a request through the Hague Convention. Critics dismiss both as too cumbersome.
The Bank of China said the US lawsuits had put it in an “impossible position,” caught between “US court orders that compel BOC to freeze, turn over or disclose information about bank accounts in China, and Chinese law, which requires the bank not to freeze or turn over accounts in China.”
Gucci and Tiffany declined to comment on the ongoing litigation.
In a statement released on Friday, Tiffany spokesman Carson Glover said the company is committed to combating counterfeiters and has shut down 5,000 infringing Web sites in the past three years.
ISSUES: Gogoro has been struggling with ballooning losses and was recently embroiled in alleged subsidy fraud, using Chinese-made components instead of locally made parts Gogoro Inc (睿能創意), the nation’s biggest electric scooter maker, yesterday said that its chairman and CEO Horace Luke (陸學森) has resigned amid chronic losses and probes into the company’s alleged involvement in subsidy fraud. The board of directors nominated Reuntex Group (潤泰集團) general counsel Tamon Tseng (曾夢達) as the company’s new chairman, Gogoro said in a statement. Ruentex is Gogoro’s biggest stakeholder. Gogoro Taiwan general manager Henry Chiang (姜家煒) is to serve as acting CEO during the interim period, the statement said. Luke’s departure came as a bombshell yesterday. As a company founder, he has played a key role in pushing for the
China has claimed a breakthrough in developing homegrown chipmaking equipment, an important step in overcoming US sanctions designed to thwart Beijing’s semiconductor goals. State-linked organizations are advised to use a new laser-based immersion lithography machine with a resolution of 65 nanometers or better, the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) said in an announcement this month. Although the note does not specify the supplier, the spec marks a significant step up from the previous most advanced indigenous equipment — developed by Shanghai Micro Electronics Equipment Group Co (SMEE, 上海微電子) — which stood at about 90 nanometers. MIIT’s claimed advances last
CROSS-STRAIT TENSIONS: The US company could switch orders from TSMC to alternative suppliers, but that would lower chip quality, CEO Jensen Huang said Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), whose products have become the hottest commodity in the technology world, on Wednesday said that the scramble for a limited amount of supply has frustrated some customers and raised tensions. “The demand on it is so great, and everyone wants to be first and everyone wants to be most,” he told the audience at a Goldman Sachs Group Inc technology conference in San Francisco. “We probably have more emotional customers today. Deservedly so. It’s tense. We’re trying to do the best we can.” Huang’s company is experiencing strong demand for its latest generation of chips, called
GLOBAL ECONOMY: Policymakers have a choice of a small 25 basis-point cut or a bold cut of 50 basis points, which would help the labor market, but might reignite inflation The US Federal Reserve is gearing up to announce its first interest rate cut in more than four years on Wednesday, with policymakers expected to debate how big a move to make less than two months before the US presidential election. Senior officials at the US central bank including Fed Chairman Jerome Powell have in recent weeks indicated that a rate cut is coming this month, as inflation eases toward the bank’s long-term target of two percent, and the labor market continues to cool. The Fed, which has a dual mandate from the US Congress to act independently to ensure