Goldman Sachs is paying its largest bill yet to resolve a US government lawsuit related to the 2007 to 2009 financial crisis.
The bank said on Friday that it had agreed to a US$3.15 billion buyback of mortgage bonds from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to end a lawsuit filed in 2011 by the US Federal Housing Finance Agency, the regulator that oversees the two mortgage companies.
The agency had accused Goldman Sachs of unloading low-quality mortgage bonds onto Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the run-up to the financial crisis. It estimates that Goldman is now paying US$1.2 billion more than the bonds are worth.
Most of the other 18 banks that faced similar suits from the agency have already reached settlements. The previous settlements have included penalties, which Goldman avoided.
However, Goldman had been hoping to avoid settling the suit altogether, contending as recently as last month that many of the agency’s claims should be dismissed.
The US$1.2 billion figure is poignant because it is more than double the US$550 million payment that Goldman made in 2010 to settle the most prominent crisis-era case it has faced — the so-called “Abacus” case.
Since then, Goldman Sachs has largely avoided the billions of US dollars paid in penalties by other banks for wrongdoing before the 2008 crisis. This week, Bank of America reached a US$16.65 billion settlement with the US Department of Justice related to the bank’s handling of mortgages.
In a separate deal this year, Bank of America agreed to pay US$9.5 billion to settle its part of the agency’s lawsuit. Some of that money was a penalty and the rest was used to buy back mortgage bonds.
The bill for Goldman Sachs has been much lower than that of other banks largely because it did not originate subprime loans. The firm did, however, buy subprime mortgages and bundle them into bonds that it sold to investors, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The primary business line for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is financing loans for homeowners, but before 2008, the two companies also bought mortgage bonds like the ones at issue in the Goldman case.
Last month, lawyers for the housing agency presented new evidence that Goldman was aware of weaknesses in the subprime mortgage market — and was placing bets against it — but did not pass on that information to clients buying subprime bonds.
“Goldman Sachs promptly established massive and lucrative short positions in mortgage-related securities while continuing to sell such securities to investors without disclosing its true assessment of the underlying loans,” agency lawyers wrote in the filing last month.
The accusations are similar to those that Goldman Sachs confronted in the Abacus lawsuit that was brought by the US Securities and Exchange Commission in 2010, and those in a US Senate investigation that grew out of that case.
The firm was accused of setting up a complicated mortgage security that it marketed to investors without telling them it planned to bet against the same loans.
From the customer’s perspective, car rental is a straightforward business. The only uncertainty is whether the hire company will charge you for the scratch they discover when you hand back the vehicle. Hertz Global Holdings Inc’s bankruptcy protection filing on Friday last week was a reminder that today even the simplest business models are underpinned by a lot more financial complexity than meets the eye. The proximate cause of Hertz’s demise was of course the sudden collapse in bookings caused by COVID-19 travel restrictions. The company’s monthly revenue last month fell 73 percent year-on-year, a shortfall that even the most resilient
Uber Technologies Inc, Lyft Inc and Airbnb Inc have slashed thousands of jobs. Salesforce.com Inc and Visa Inc are letting employees work remotely for months; Twitter Inc and Square Inc are allowing them to do so for good. For the companies’ hometown of San Francisco, the moves are early signs of a dire blow. In a city with a long history of booms, busts and natural calamities, the COVID-19 pandemic has suddenly upended nearly a decade of prosperity. While municipalities across the US are grappling with economic fallout from the virus, San Francisco stands to take a deeper hit given its high
BULK PURCHASE: The French chain and Hong Kong-based Dairy Farm International reached a deal covering 224 stores, which is expected to be finalized by year’s end Carrefour SA yesterday announced it would acquire Wellcome Taiwan Co (惠康百貨) for 97 million euros (US$108.33 million), and bring all the Wellcome supermarkets (頂好超市) and Jasons Market Place stores nationwide under its banner within 12 months of the deal closing. The France-based hypermarket chain reached an agreement with Hong Kong-based Dairy Farm International Holdings (牛奶國際控股), the pan-Asian retailer that launched Wellcome Taiwan in 1987. The transaction involves 199 Wellcome supermarkets, which have average sales areas of 420m2 and 25 high-end Jasons Market Place stores, which have an average sales area of 820m2, as well as a warehouse in Taoyuan, Carrefour Taiwan (家樂福)
‘ONE-STOP SHOP’: A Miaoli official said that the factory in the Jhunan section of the Hsinchu Science Park would create more than 1,000 jobs and boost prosperity A new high-end IC packaging and testing plant planned by contract chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) in Miaoli County is expected to start operations in the middle of next year, Miaoli County Commissioner Hsu Yao-chang (徐耀昌) said. Hsu wrote on Facebook that TSMC, the world’s largest pure wafer foundry operator, would invest NT$303.2 billion (US$10.1 billion) to build the plant, the largest-ever single investment in Taiwan. However, TSMC declined to disclose the financial terms of the deal, while a company board meeting on May 12 approved a spending plan worth NT$168.2 billion as part of its investment plans. Construction of the