Goldman Sachs is paying its largest bill yet to resolve a US government lawsuit related to the 2007 to 2009 financial crisis.
The bank said on Friday that it had agreed to a US$3.15 billion buyback of mortgage bonds from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to end a lawsuit filed in 2011 by the US Federal Housing Finance Agency, the regulator that oversees the two mortgage companies.
The agency had accused Goldman Sachs of unloading low-quality mortgage bonds onto Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the run-up to the financial crisis. It estimates that Goldman is now paying US$1.2 billion more than the bonds are worth.
Most of the other 18 banks that faced similar suits from the agency have already reached settlements. The previous settlements have included penalties, which Goldman avoided.
However, Goldman had been hoping to avoid settling the suit altogether, contending as recently as last month that many of the agency’s claims should be dismissed.
The US$1.2 billion figure is poignant because it is more than double the US$550 million payment that Goldman made in 2010 to settle the most prominent crisis-era case it has faced — the so-called “Abacus” case.
Since then, Goldman Sachs has largely avoided the billions of US dollars paid in penalties by other banks for wrongdoing before the 2008 crisis. This week, Bank of America reached a US$16.65 billion settlement with the US Department of Justice related to the bank’s handling of mortgages.
In a separate deal this year, Bank of America agreed to pay US$9.5 billion to settle its part of the agency’s lawsuit. Some of that money was a penalty and the rest was used to buy back mortgage bonds.
The bill for Goldman Sachs has been much lower than that of other banks largely because it did not originate subprime loans. The firm did, however, buy subprime mortgages and bundle them into bonds that it sold to investors, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The primary business line for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is financing loans for homeowners, but before 2008, the two companies also bought mortgage bonds like the ones at issue in the Goldman case.
Last month, lawyers for the housing agency presented new evidence that Goldman was aware of weaknesses in the subprime mortgage market — and was placing bets against it — but did not pass on that information to clients buying subprime bonds.
“Goldman Sachs promptly established massive and lucrative short positions in mortgage-related securities while continuing to sell such securities to investors without disclosing its true assessment of the underlying loans,” agency lawyers wrote in the filing last month.
The accusations are similar to those that Goldman Sachs confronted in the Abacus lawsuit that was brought by the US Securities and Exchange Commission in 2010, and those in a US Senate investigation that grew out of that case.
The firm was accused of setting up a complicated mortgage security that it marketed to investors without telling them it planned to bet against the same loans.
To many, Tatu City on the outskirts of Nairobi looks like a success. The first city entirely built by a private company to be operational in east Africa, with about 25,000 people living and working there, it accounts for about two-thirds of all foreign investment in Kenya. Its low-tax status has attracted more than 100 businesses including Heineken, coffee brand Dormans, and the biggest call-center and cold-chain transport firms in the region. However, to some local politicians, Tatu City has looked more like a target for extortion. A parade of governors have demanded land worth millions of dollars in exchange
An Indonesian animated movie is smashing regional box office records and could be set for wider success as it prepares to open beyond the Southeast Asian archipelago’s silver screens. Jumbo — a film based on the adventures of main character, Don, a large orphaned Indonesian boy facing bullying at school — last month became the highest-grossing Southeast Asian animated film, raking in more than US$8 million. Released at the end of March to coincide with the Eid holidays after the Islamic fasting month of Ramadan, the movie has hit 8 million ticket sales, the third-highest in Indonesian cinema history, Film
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) revenue jumped 48 percent last month, underscoring how electronics firms scrambled to acquire essential components before global tariffs took effect. The main chipmaker for Apple Inc and Nvidia Corp reported monthly sales of NT$349.6 billion (US$11.6 billion). That compares with the average analysts’ estimate for a 38 percent rise in second-quarter revenue. US President Donald Trump’s trade war is prompting economists to retool GDP forecasts worldwide, casting doubt over the outlook for everything from iPhone demand to computing and datacenter construction. However, TSMC — a barometer for global tech spending given its central role in the
Alchip Technologies Ltd (世芯), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) designer specializing in server chips, expects revenue to decline this year due to sagging demand for 5-nanometer artificial intelligence (AI) chips from a North America-based major customer, a company executive said yesterday. That would be the first contraction in revenue for Alchip as it has been enjoying strong revenue growth over the past few years, benefiting from cloud-service providers’ moves to reduce dependence on Nvidia Corp’s expensive AI chips by building their own AI accelerator by outsourcing chip design. The 5-nanometer chip was supposed to be a new growth engine as the lifecycle