Apple Inc suppliers are scrambling to get enough screens ready for the company’s new iPhone 6 as the need to redesign a key component disrupted panel production ahead of next month’s expected launch, supply chain sources said.
It is unclear whether the hiccup could delay the launch or limit the number of phones initially available to consumers, the sources said, as Apple prepares to roll out larger-screen iPhones for the year-end shopping season.
The issue highlights the risks and challenges that suppliers face to meet Apple’s tough specifications, and comes after a separate screen technology problem, since resolved, in making thinner screens for the larger iPhone 6.
Cupertino, California-based Apple has scheduled a media event for Sept. 9, where many expect it to unveil the iPhone 6 with both 4.7 inch and 5.5 inch-screens — bigger than the 4-inch screen on the iPhone 5s and 5c.
Two supply chain sources said display panel production suffered a setback after the backlight that illuminates the screen had to be revised, putting screen assembly on hold for part of June and last month. One said that Apple, aiming for the thinnest phone possible, initially wanted to cut back to a single layer of backlight film, instead of the standard two layers for the 4.7-inch screen, which went into mass production ahead of the 5.5-inch version.
However, the new configuration was not bright enough and the backlight was sent back to the drawing board to fit in the extra layer, which cost time and temporarily halted some screen assembly operations, the source said.
Output is now back on track and suppliers are working hard to make up for lost time, the supply chain sources added.
Japan Display Inc, Sharp Corp and South Korea’s LG Display Co Ltd have been selected to make the iPhone 6 screens, the sources said.
Apple is known to make tough demands on its parts suppliers for new iPhones and iPads, as it competes to create designs, shapes, sizes and features that set it apart and command a premium price in the fiercely competitive gadget market.
This can cause glitches and delays, including screen problems that crimped supplies of the high-resolution version of Apple’s iPad Mini last year.
It also highlights the danger for suppliers of depending too heavily on Apple for revenues, creating earnings volatility.
Earlier this month, Japan Display, said to be the lead supplier for the new iPhone panel, said orders for “a large customer” — which analysts said was Apple — arrived as expected, but shipments might be delayed in the July-to-September quarter.
Japan Display’s reliance on Apple’s cyclical business has made some investors wary. UBS Securities forecast that Apple would contribute more than a third of the Japanese firm’s total revenue in the year to March next year.
The nation’s Apple suppliers and assemblers saw lower-than-expected growth last month even as factories rushed output ahead of new smartphone launches, reflecting the erratic nature of the business.
“Currently, there’s a small shortage in supply of a specialized component for our communication devices,” a Pegatron Corp (和碩) spokesman said. “This kind of problem regularly occurs and the impact on production is negligible.”
Supply chain sources had previously said challenges with the new iPhone’s screen in-cell technology, which eliminates one of the layers in the LCD screen to make it thinner, caused a delay in the production of the larger 5.5-inch version.
One display industry source said the in-cell issues had now been resolved.
The government yesterday approved applications by Alphabet Inc’s Google to invest NT$27.08 billion (US$859.98 million) in Taiwan, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said in a statement. The Department of Investment Review approved two investments proposed by Google, with much of the funds to be used for data processing and electronic information supply services, as well as inventory procurement businesses in the semiconductor field, the ministry said. It marks the second consecutive year that Google has applied to increase its investment in Taiwan. Google plans to infuse NT$25.34 billion into Charter Investments Ltd (特許投資顧問) through its Singapore-based subsidiary Fructan Holdings Singapore Pte Ltd, and
Micron Technology Inc is a driving force pushing the US Congress to pass legislation that would put new export restrictions on equipment its Chinese competitors use to make their chips, according to people familiar with the matter. A US House of Representatives panel yesterday was to vote on the “MATCH Act,” a bill designed to close gaps in restrictions on chipmaking equipment. It would also pressure foreign companies that sell equipment to Chinese chipmaking facilities to align with export curbs on US companies like Lam Research Corp and Applied Materials Inc. The bill targets facilities operated by China’s ChangXin Memory Technologies Inc
Singapore-based ride-hailing and delivery giant Grab Holdings’ planned acquisition of Foodpanda’s Taiwan operations has yet to enter the formal review stage, as regulators await supplementary documents, the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) said yesterday. Acting FTC Chairman Chen Chih-min (陳志民) told the legislature’s Economics Committee that although Grab submitted its application on March 27, the case has not been officially accepted because required materials remain incomplete. Once the filing is finalized, the FTC would launch a formal probe into the deal, focusing on issues such as cross-shareholding and potential restrictions on market competition, Chen told lawmakers. Grab last month announced that it would acquire
SECOND-RATE: Models distilled from US products do not perform the same as the original and undo measures that ensure the systems are neutral, the US’ cable said The US Department of State has ordered a global push to bring attention to what it said are widespread efforts by Chinese companies, including artificial intelligence (AI) start-up DeepSeek (深度求索), to steal intellectual property from US AI labs, according to a diplomatic cable. The cable, dated Friday and sent to diplomatic and consular posts around the world, instructs diplomatic staff to speak to their foreign counterparts about “concerns over adversaries’ extraction and distillation of US AI models.” Distillation is the process of training smaller AI models using output from larger, more expensive ones to lower the costs of training a powerful new