Sun, May 25, 2014 - Page 14 News List

Peaceful Sweden ‘arming dictators’ as defense booms

By Tom Sullivan  /  AFP, LINKOePING, Sweden

Saab AB’s Gripen F fighter jet flies over Axalp in Switzerland’s Bernese Oberland during a flight demonstration by the Swiss Air Force on Oct. 11, 2012.

Photo: AFP

Alongside its global reputation as a peacemaker and generous foreign aid donor, Sweden has become a major supplier of weapons and counts a number of regimes criticized for human rights abuses among its customers.

Ranked as the world’s third-largest arms exporter per capita after Israel and Russia, Sweden’s booming defense industry has stirred up ethical concerns among Swedes about some of the countries it is doing business with.

At a hangar in Sweden’s military-industrial complex, Saab AB technicians are building an assembly line for the next generation of Gripen fighters, which are equipped with state-of-the-art warfare systems and larger weapons bays, and at least 60 of which are for the Swedish Air Force.

The Gripen E is designed to stand up to Russia’s best warplanes and boasts a unique networking system that allows the planes to communicate and divide up tasks such as detecting, electronic jamming and firing, Saab operations chief Lars Ydreskog said at the company’s plant in Linkoeping, southern Sweden.

“It was this tactical way of working that was noticed by Brazil and Switzerland,” he said, referring Saab’s fighter jet beating out stiff French and US competition, even though Swiss voters ultimately rejected a deal for 22 Gripens in a referendum last weekend.

Saab and other Sweden-based firms, including BAE Systems AB and Bofors, have been hugely successful in the 2000s, selling weapons and defense material to 55 countries to the tune of US$1.8 billion over the previous year.

Amid the boom, critics charge that Sweden has become more inclined to arm regimes accused of human rights abuses, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Pakistan, as demand from Western nations has ebbed.

“Swedes see themselves as very ethical and restrictive when it comes to giving human rights violators or dictators things that help them stay in power, but the reality is that [that] has happened,” said Siemon Wezeman, an arms expert at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

“In the last decade or so, they’ve been more open to it, because those are the markets,” he added. “In the past they wouldn’t have done business with Saudi Arabia due to human rights concerns — it’s obviously a place that rings all kinds of alarm bells — but that has changed... They’ve sold them Eriye [radar tracking systems] and anti-tank missiles, and marketed other weapons there.”

Other sales have been clandestine. In 2012, the country’s public radio revealed that the Swedish Defence Research Agency has provided Riyadh with covert technical support for a missile factory, leading to the resignation of a minister of defense and a probe into new ethical criteria for weapons sales.

One of Sweden’s most polemic exports, the Saab-made Carl Gustav rocket launcher used by the US and other armies has reportedly fallen into the hands of groups that Stockholm would not normally trade with, including the Burmese military and Islamist extremists al-Shabaab in Somalia.

Peace activist Martin Smedjeback said that Sweden’s original reason for developing a large weapons industry — the desire to be self sufficient and independent — has vanished, along with the country’s policy of neutrality as it develops closer ties to NATO.

“Politicians raise the issue of jobs and technology because there are all these other arguments that they cannot use, like: ‘It’s macho and I like macho things,’” he said. “And they also can’t say that the weapons industry is powerful and they have influence over the decisions of politicians.”

This story has been viewed 3787 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top