A former Goldman Sachs trader who earned the nickname “Fabulous Fab” has been found liable in a fraud case brought by US federal regulators in response to the 2007 mortgage crisis that helped push the US into recession.
A jury on Thursday reached the verdict at the civil trial in Manhattan Federal Court of Fabrice Tourre — a French-born Stanford graduate described by US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawyers as the face of “Wall Street greed.” Tourre’s attorneys portrayed him as a scapegoat in a downturn caused by larger economic forces.
Tourre, 34, was found liable in six of seven SEC fraud and other claims. He faces potential fines and a possible ban from the financial industry. The exact penalty will be determined at a future proceeding.
The commission had accused Tourre of misleading institutional investors about subprime mortgage securities that he knew were doomed to fail, setting the stage for a valued Goldman hedge fund client, Paulson & Co Inc, to secretly bet against the investment.
The maneuver ended up making US$1 billion for the hedge fund and its wealthy president, John Paulson, and millions of dollars in fees for Goldman. The SEC also sought to show that it helped earn Tourre a bonus that boosted his salary to US$1.7 million in 2007.
On the witness stand, the commission’s lawyers confronted Tourre with a January 2007 e-mail it said deliberately misled another institutional investor about Paulson’s short position in the investment called Abacus 2007-AC1.
Asked repeatedly if the information in the e-mail was “false,” Tourre responded: “It was not accurate.”
He added: “I wasn’t trying to confuse anybody; it just wasn’t accurate at the time.”
Leaving the courtroom on Thursday, SEC lawyer Matthew Martens said: “We’re obviously gratified by the jury’s verdict and appreciate their hard work.”
Tourre left the courthouse without speaking to reporters. His attorney also had no immediate comment.
In closing arguments, Martens called Tourre’s testimony “surreal, imaginary, unreal, dream-like” and told jurors that the defendant wanted them “to live in his imaginary land ... to live in a fantasy world.”
“Only if you close your eyes to the facts, you can find Mr. Tourre not liable for his actions,” the SEC lawyer said.
Tourre’s attorney, John Coffey, countered that the government had “unjustly accused him of wrongdoing.”
Coffey urged jurors to put the investment’s failure in perspective, noting that all similarly packaged securities “went off the cliff as well” after 2007.
The civil case had been called the most significant legal action related to the US mortgage securities meltdown, but it lacked the drama and high stakes of white-collar criminal cases. Much of the testimony was devoted to the intricacies of synthetic collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs — a complex type of investment central to the case.
Some of the testimony focused on a personal e-mail Tourre sent to his girlfriend in France. The SEC lawyers said the missive proved the hubris of a man at the center of a massive fraud, while the defense claimed was “an old-fashioned love letter” penned by a young trader who was full of self-doubt and angst over upheaval in the financial world.
Writing in French, Tourre said of the financial markets: “The whole building is about to collapse any time now.”