Thu, Jan 31, 2013 - Page 15 News List

Airlines had battery problems prior to recent incidents

DREAMLINER:ANA said it changed 10 batteries on its 787s last year, but did not inform authorities because the incidents did not compromise safety

Reuters, TOKYO

Japan’s two biggest airlines replaced below-par lithium-ion batteries on their Boeing Co 787 Dreamliners in the months before separate incidents led to the technologically advanced aircraft being grounded worldwide due to battery problems.

Comments from both All Nippon Airways (ANA), the new Boeing jetliner’s biggest customer to date, and Japan Airlines Co (JAL) point to reliability issues with the batteries long before a battery caught fire on a JAL 787 at Boston’s airport and a second battery was badly charred and melted on an ANA domestic flight that was forced into an emergency landing.

LOW CHARGES

ANA said it changed 10 batteries on its 787s last year, but did not inform accident investigators in the US because the incidents, including five batteries that had unusually low charges, did not compromise the plane’s safety, spokesman Ryosei Nomura said yesterday.

JAL also replaced batteries on the 787 “on a few occasions,” spokeswoman Sze Hunn Yap said, declining to be more specific on when units were replaced or whether these were reported to authorities.

However, ANA did inform Boeing of the faults that began in May and returned the batteries to their manufacturer, GS Yuasa Corp. A spokesman for the battery maker declined to comment yesterday. Shares of the company fell 1.2 percent.

Boeing spokesman Marc Birtel said the airplane maker could not comment as the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has indicated this is now part of its investigation.

The New York Times earlier quoted an NTSB spokeswoman as saying the agency would include these “numerous issues” with the 787 battery in its investigations.

DETAILED INSPECTIONS

Under aviation inspection rules, airlines are required to perform detailed battery inspections once every two years.

Officials are carrying out detailed tests on the batteries, chargers and monitoring units in Japan and the US, but have so far made little headway in finding out what caused the battery failures.

Japan’s transport ministry said the manufacturing process at the company that makes the 787 battery’s monitoring unit did not appear to be linked to the problem on the ANA Dreamliner that made the emergency landing.

The NTSB said on Tuesday it was carrying out a microscopic investigation of the JAL 787 battery. Neither it nor the Japan Transport Safety Board has been able to say when they are likely to complete their work.

GROUNDED

The global fleet of 50 Dreamliners — 17 of which are operated by ANA — remain grounded, increasing the likely financial impact to Boeing, which is still producing the aircraft, but has stopped delivering them, and the airlines that fly the Dreamliner.

This story has been viewed 885 times.
TOP top