A call by Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) for cooperation between domestic small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and their Chinese counterparts is well-intended, but businesspeople should proceed only on condition Taiwanese businesses are protected, business leaders said yesterday.
“China must show its commitment to facilitating a mechanism to protect the rights of Taiwanese companies doing business there before smoothing out hurdles for possible cross-strait business cooperation,” Paul Wang (王振保), secretary-general of the National Association of Small and Medium Enterprises (中小企業協會), said by telephone.
“We often hear of Taiwanese investors falling victim to Chinese partners, who pillage the Taiwanese-funded companies,” he said.
Wang nevertheless threw his support behind Chen’s call for both sides to cooperate to expand export markets, saying that Chinese businesses shouldn’t necessarily be viewed as competitors.
“If the partnership turns out to benefit and make money for both sides, why not?” he asked.
During his trip to Taiwan, Chen on Wednesday urged Taiwanese SMEs to complement their business strength with that of their privately owned peers in Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces before tapping into the world market.
He encouraged Taiwanese SMEs in the traditional industries to explore business opportunities from China’s stimulus measures to spur domestic consumption, including the building of infrastructure, subsidies to the automobile sector and purchases of home appliances in rural provinces, as well as the transfer to energy-saving products such as high-tech light-emitting diode (LED) lighting products.
Tony Cheng (鄭榮文), honorary chairman of the Taiwan Merchant Association in Shenzhen, said yesterday that few of his association’s up to 4,000 SMEs were inclined to partner with Chinese businessmen.
“Like tying the knot in a marriage, it’s always hard to find the right [business] partner here in China who shares your business strategies, philosophy and integrity,” Cheng said by telephone.
He nevertheless said that he didn’t rule out the possibility that Taiwanese businesses, which have an edge in research and development, quality control and management skills, can locate suitable Chinese partners to take advantage of their locally well-known brands and their knowledge about the Chinese market to create synergies for both sides.
“It takes time to find a perfect partner and get familiar with it before initiating any cooperation,” he said, adding that any cooperation should not be hurried.
Secretary-general of the Taiwan Chain Stores and Franchise Association (連鎖加盟促進協會) Beryl Lee (李培芬) said Taiwanese businesses have to be flexible with their Chinese partners.
Taiwanese chain stores and franchises often need to leverage capital and talent in China when they attempt to branch into the market, she said.
Franchising models in Taiwan do not often apply in China, she said.
For example, a Taiwanese children’s wear chain has had a hard time asking its Chinese franchisees to keep up with its benchmark standards in service quality and store cleanness, she said.
“The Taiwanese owner had to take his Chinese franchisees to a five-star hotel to make them understand the level of store cleanness he was looking for,” she said.
So, interim administrators are often established in China to help manage the Chinese chains until they meet standards, something unnecessary in Taiwan, Lee said.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) secured a record 70.2 percent share of the global foundry business in the second quarter, up from 67.6 percent the previous quarter, and continued widening its lead over second-placed Samsung Electronics Co, TrendForce Corp (集邦科技) said on Monday. TSMC posted US$30.24 billion in sales in the April-to-June period, up 18.5 percent from the previous quarter, driven by major smartphone customers entering their ramp-up cycle and robust demand for artificial intelligence chips, laptops and PCs, which boosted wafer shipments and average selling prices, TrendForce said in a report. Samsung’s sales also grew in the second quarter, up
LIMITED IMPACT: Investor confidence was likely sustained by its relatively small exposure to the Chinese market, as only less advanced chips are made in Nanjing Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) saw its stock price close steady yesterday in a sign that the loss of the validated end user (VEU) status for its Nanjing, China, fab should have a mild impact on the world’s biggest contract chipmaker financially and technologically. Media reports about the waiver loss sent TSMC down 1.29 percent during the early trading session yesterday, but the stock soon regained strength and ended at NT$1,160, unchanged from Tuesday. Investors’ confidence in TSMC was likely built on its relatively small exposure to the Chinese market, as Chinese customers contributed about 9 percent to TSMC’s revenue last
LOOPHOLES: The move is to end a break that was aiding foreign producers without any similar benefit for US manufacturers, the US Department of Commerce said US President Donald Trump’s administration would make it harder for Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix Inc to ship critical equipment to their chipmaking operations in China, dealing a potential blow to the companies’ production in the world’s largest semiconductor market. The US Department of Commerce in a notice published on Friday said that it was revoking waivers for Samsung and SK Hynix to use US technologies in their Chinese operations. The companies had been operating in China under regulations that allow them to import chipmaking equipment without applying for a new license each time. The move would revise what is known
UNCERTAINTY: A final ruling against the president’s tariffs would upend his trade deals and force the government to content with billions of dollars in refunds The legal fight over US President Donald Trump’s global tariffs is deepening after a federal appeals court ruled the levies were issued illegally under an emergency law, extending the chaos in global trade. A 7-4 decision by a panel of judges on Friday was a major setback for Trump, even as it gives both sides something to boast about. The majority upheld a May ruling by the Court of International Trade that the tariffs were illegal. However, the judges left the levies intact while the case proceeds, as Trump had requested, and suggested that any injunction could potentially be narrowed to apply
RSS