Taiwan-based China Airlines (華航), which marks its 50th birthday this week, can look back at half a century of turbulence, but the future could bring even more formidable challenges, analysts said.
While in the past an abysmal safety record was the main problem, now the carrier faces completely different threats from China’s aggressive state-controlled airlines and the region’s nimble low-cost carriers.
“It’s a company that has come through years of external shocks and storms probably shaken, but still fighting,” said Derek Sadubin, an analyst with the Center for Asia Pacific Aviation, a Sydney-based consultancy. “They’ve got the support of the Taiwan government behind them, which has given them a degree of confidence, but it’s an airline that really needs to step up a gear to face the challenges ahead.”
PHOTO: PATRICK LIN, AFP
Starting out on Dec. 16, 1959 with just two World War II-era flying boats, China Airlines has grown into an international carrier with a fleet of 66 modern aircraft.
What has also grown with the company, which is 54 percent owned by a state fund, is a record of spectacular crashes that have made it one of the riskiest carriers in Asia.
Among the more recent, in May 2002 a Boeing 747 smashed into the Taiwan Straits, killing all 225 people on board. Five years later, a Boeing 737 burst into flames while landing in Okinawa, although without fatalities.
A propensity for risk-taking among the carrier’s pilots, who for decades were recruited mainly from the island’s air force, has often been pinpointed as a liability.
“Their staff are more like government employees than their counterparts in other companies,” said Bruce Tsao, a Taipei-based analyst with Capital Securities (群益證券). “It’s an old company with a government background. That mentality may be related to its safety track record.”
The carrier’s reputation for poor safety has forced it to take a series of steps aimed at renewal “from inside out,” said Debbie Wu (吳宜蓁), a public relations expert at Fu-Jen Catholic University in Taipei.
“This ranges from organizational reconstruction to buying new jets and designing new uniforms, and the consumers have noticed the changes,” she said. “The public is forgetful, and the airline has diverted attention from the negative news by creating new topics with these moves. It has successfully turned its image around.”
But one thing has not changed: the company’s name, which dates from a time when Taiwan’s leaders, refugees from communist-controlled China, still claimed to represent all of the country.
China Airlines may in fact be a more apt name now than it has been for a long time because of the enormous opportunities associated with the booming China market.
A thaw in relations between China and Taiwan means the carrier now operates 55 weekly flights to 13 cities in China.
While it faces competitors from both Taiwan and China, the China routes are a sure earner because of rules that exclude foreign airlines.
“Basically, most players in this market are winners,” said Francis Hsiao (蕭義展), a Taipei-based analyst with Grand Cathay Securities (大華證券).
Taiwan’s long-term economic competitiveness will hinge not only on national champions like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC, 台積電) but also on the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and other emerging technologies, a US-based scholar has said. At a lecture in Taipei on Tuesday, Jeffrey Ding, assistant professor of political science at the George Washington University and author of "Technology and the Rise of Great Powers," argued that historical experience shows that general-purpose technologies (GPTs) — such as electricity, computers and now AI — shape long-term economic advantages through their diffusion across the broader economy. "What really matters is not who pioneers
In a high-security Shenzhen laboratory, Chinese scientists have built what Washington has spent years trying to prevent: a prototype of a machine capable of producing the cutting-edge semiconductor chips that power artificial intelligence (AI), smartphones and weapons central to Western military dominance, Reuters has learned. Completed early this year and undergoing testing, the prototype fills nearly an entire factory floor. It was built by a team of former engineers from Dutch semiconductor giant ASML who reverse-engineered the company’s extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV) machines, according to two people with knowledge of the project. EUV machines sit at the heart of a technological Cold
TAIWAN VALUE CHAIN: Foxtron is to fully own Luxgen following the transaction and it plans to launch a new electric model, the Foxtron Bria, in Taiwan next year Yulon Motor Co (裕隆汽車) yesterday said that its board of directors approved the disposal of its electric vehicle (EV) unit, Luxgen Motor Co (納智捷汽車), to Foxtron Vehicle Technologies Co (鴻華先進) for NT$787.6 million (US$24.98 million). Foxtron, a half-half joint venture between Yulon affiliate Hua-Chuang Automobile Information Technical Center Co (華創車電) and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密), expects to wrap up the deal in the first quarter of next year. Foxtron would fully own Luxgen following the transaction, including five car distributing companies, outlets and all employees. The deal is subject to the approval of the Fair Trade Commission, Foxtron said. “Foxtron will be
BUBBLE? Only a handful of companies are seeing rapid revenue growth and higher valuations, and it is not enough to call the AI trend a transformation, an analyst said Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering a more challenging phase next year as companies move beyond experimentation and begin demanding clear financial returns from a technology that has delivered big gains to only a small group of early adopters, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Taiwan said yesterday. Most organizations have been able to justify AI investments through cost recovery or modest efficiency gains, but few have achieved meaningful revenue growth or long-term competitive advantage, the consultancy said in its 2026 AI Business Predictions report. This growing performance gap is forcing executives to reconsider how AI is deployed across their organizations, it said. “Many companies