The impact of the global financial crisis is still in its “first half,” but there is only a brief opportunity to bring tough reforms, the World Economic Forum (WEF) said on Friday.
“It is still too early for people to pat themselves on the back and say that we’ve managed to get through the crisis,” WEF managing director Richard Samans said.
“I think we’re still in the first half of the aftermath of this crisis,” Samans said on the sidelines of the forum’s second summit on the global agenda in Dubai.
Other forum participants agreed, saying the recovery was threatened by a wide range of problems thrown up by the US-rooted global financial crisis.
“The truth is that we did our best, but [the world is] still going through the storm,” Mohammed Alabbar, head of a committee tasked with helping Dubai counter the impact of the crisis, told the conference.
“The world ... is in trouble, because government debts are out of control, banking is at risk, consumer debt is very high and unemployment of course is high,” he said.
“Deficits [around] the world are staggering,” Alabbar said. “And what’s the consequence of that? Most probably education might suffer as a result of that. Health care will be at risk as a result of that.”
Mark Malloch-Brown, senior adviser for the WEF’s Global Redesign Initiative, told conference participants: “What spurred us all to come here is this sense the crisis isn’t behind us.”
However, “the crisis created malleability, a moment of opportunity to introduce new ideas, to bring changes [to] the global system which in normal times would either not even be contemplated or would take years to get done,” he added.
John Gieve, a senior fellow at Harvard University, warned of the risk posed by complacency now that the most dire moments of the economic crisis have passed.
“There is some risk that with less acute worries about the short-term, the momentum for reform may be ebbing,” Gieve said.
Sharan Burrow, president of the International Trade Union Confederation, agreed.
“We’ve got a window of opportunity. The crisis has focused the minds of the governments,” Burrow said.
Quanta Computer Inc (廣達) chairman Barry Lam (林百里) is expected to share his views about the artificial intelligence (AI) industry’s prospects during his speech at the company’s 37th anniversary ceremony, as AI servers have become a new growth engine for the equipment manufacturing service provider. Lam’s speech is much anticipated, as Quanta has risen as one of the world’s major AI server suppliers. The company reported a 30 percent year-on-year growth in consolidated revenue to NT$1.41 trillion (US$43.35 billion) last year, thanks to fast-growing demand for servers, especially those with AI capabilities. The company told investors in November last year that
Taiwanese suppliers to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC, 台積電) are expected to follow the contract chipmaker’s step to invest in the US, but their relocation may be seven to eight years away, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. When asked by opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Niu Hsu-ting (牛煦庭) in the legislature about growing concerns that TSMC’s huge investments in the US will prompt its suppliers to follow suit, Kuo said based on the chipmaker’s current limited production volume, it is unlikely to lead its supply chain to go there for now. “Unless TSMC completes its planned six
Intel Corp has named Tasha Chuang (莊蓓瑜) to lead Intel Taiwan in a bid to reinforce relations between the company and its Taiwanese partners. The appointment of Chuang as general manager for Intel Taiwan takes effect on Thursday, the firm said in a statement yesterday. Chuang is to lead her team in Taiwan to pursue product development and sales growth in an effort to reinforce the company’s ties with its partners and clients, Intel said. Chuang was previously in charge of managing Intel’s ties with leading Taiwanese PC brand Asustek Computer Inc (華碩), which included helping Asustek strengthen its global businesses, the company
TikTok abounds with viral videos accusing prestigious brands of secretly manufacturing luxury goods in China so they can be sold at cut prices. However, while these “revelations” are spurious, behind them lurks a well-oiled machine for selling counterfeit goods that is making the most of the confusion surrounding trade tariffs. Chinese content creators who portray themselves as workers or subcontractors in the luxury goods business claim that Beijing has lifted confidentiality clauses on local subcontractors as a way to respond to the huge hike in customs duties imposed on China by US President Donald Trump. They say this Chinese decision, of which Agence