Even as Britain's property market shows signs of struggling, one north London street is defying the gloom-mongers: houses on "billionaire's avenue" are still selling for record prices.
Like an oasis of wealth in an increasingly parched real estate desert, The Bishops Avenue in Hampstead remains a property hotspot -- despite, for some, little in the way of elegance or discretion.
"Among the wealthiest in the world, The Bishops Avenue is better know than Buckingham Palace," Trevor Abrahamson of estate agents Glentree International said with a hint of pride, having sold most of the 66 houses in the street.
After a period of uncertainty when the Dotcom bubble burst around 2000 -- empty properties were occupied by squatters, and there were serious questions over the area's future -- the avenue has recently regained its luster.
Early last month billionaire Russian-Israeli Lev Leviev bought a villa on The Bishops Avenue -- the definite article underlines its exclusiveness -- for a record-setting £35 million (US$68 million).
Only a few weeks later, that record was shattered by a billionaire from Kazakhstan, Horelma Perama, who put up no less than £50 million to buy the "Toprak Mansion."
With its pillared facade, the huge building sets a new standard of excess on the already gaudy street -- the mansion includes 2,600 square meters of living space, a 25m dining room, and a garage for 28 cars.
It is generally felt that discretion and understatement did not feature high on the list of demands made by the previous owner, Turkish businessman Halis Toprak.
No matter -- "it's a statement of wealth," Abrahamson said.
Foreigners with deep pockets who constitute the majority of the buyers find the street especially attractive because of the advantages it offers.
It is surrounded by two golf courses and 4 million sqaure meters of parkland, and is close to the center of the capital.
In short, the area combines vast tracts of land with planning policies weak enough to allow for unbridled extravagance.
That makes it perfect for "a person who wants to combine the townhouse and the country house," Abrahamson said.
As a result, London's financial and business elite as well as royals from countries awash with money from record oil prices, target homes side on the avenue, even though many of them spend barely a few days a year in Britain.
Indian steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal, who already owns a house on "billionaire's row" at Kensington Palace Gardens in central London, keeps a pied-a-terre there.
The same goes for British press baron Richard Desmond and the Saudi royal family.
But one cloud is looming over this real estate haven where the cheapest apartment costs £2 million.
Avenue residents are watching closely to see what becomes of a controversial new proposal to revise the advantageous tax status of non-domiciled residents, or "non-doms."
London, known as one of the world's financial hubs, is also a "tax haven" which attracts foreigners with fortunes made abroad, Abrahamson said.
"If the government tries to tinker with the domicility rules, they could find the door flung very firmly in their face, because Geneva, Frankfurt, Dubai desperately want these people, big players with big bucks," he said.
CELEBRATION: The PRC turned 75 on Oct. 1, but the Republic of China is older. The PRC could never be the homeland of the people of the ROC, Lai said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) could not be the “motherland” of the people of the Republic of China (ROC), President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks in a speech at a Double Ten National Day gala in Taipei, which is part of National Day celebrations that are to culminate in a fireworks display in Yunlin County on Thursday night next week. Lai wished the country a happy birthday and called on attendees to enjoy the performances and activities while keeping in mind that the ROC is a sovereign and independent nation. He appealed for everyone to always love their
‘EXTREME PRESSURE’: Beijing’s goal is to ‘force Taiwan to make mistakes,’ Admiral Tang Hua said, adding that mishaps could serve as ‘excuses’ for launching a blockade China’s authoritarian expansionism threatens not only Taiwan, but the rules-based international order, the navy said yesterday, after its top commander said in an interview that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could blockade the nation at will. The object of Beijing’s expansionist activities is not limited to Taiwan and its use of pressure is not confined to specific political groups or people, the navy said in a statement. China utilizes a mixture of cognitive warfare and “gray zone” military activities to pressure Taiwan, the navy said, adding that PLA sea and air forces are compressing the nation’s defensive depth. The navy continues to
MAKING PROGRESS: Officials and industry leaders who participated in a defense forum last month agreed that Taiwan has the capabilities to work with the US, the report said Taiwan’s high-tech defense industry is to enhance collaboration with the US to produce weapons needed for self-defense, the Ministry of National Defense said in a report to the Legislative Yuan. Deputy Minister of National Defense Hsu Yen-pu (徐衍璞) discussed building regional and global industry alliances with US partners at the US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference in Philadelphia held from Sept. 22 to Tuesday last week, the ministry said in the declassified portion of the report. The visit contributed to maintaining bilateral ties, facilitated Taiwan’s efforts to acquire weapons and equipment, and strengthened the resilience of the two nation’s defense industries, it said. Taiwan-US ties
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS