There just isn't enough evidence to support the increasingly popular hypothesis that Asian economies are "decoupling" from a slowing US.
Markus Rosgen, who is Citigroup Inc's chief Asia strategist in Hong Kong, says the notion that the region has its own self-sustaining growth and doesn't have to sink or swim with the US "is a case of hope over reality."
The ratio of consumption in Asian nations' GDP, he says, has declined over the last five years.
While the US share of Asian exports has fallen -- to 17 percent last year from 23 percent in 1985 -- the intra-Asian trade that has replaced it moves in lockstep with US imports.
The correlation between the growth in intraregional Asian exports and US non-oil imports has increased sixfold in the past 25 years or so, Rosgen's analysis shows.
Ditto for the flow of capital: Stock indexes in Asia are more linked with US -- and European -- benchmarks now than they have been in 30 years, Rosgen says.
Even US patent records show that Asia's decoupling from the West is going to be a long-drawn process.
The flow of knowledge isn't getting the attention it deserves in the decoupling debate, which remains largely focused on movements of trade and capital. This is odd considering that throughout history the rise of new economic nerve centers has essentially been triggered by spurts of innovation.
Economist Joseph Schumpeter called them K-waves, in honor of the Russian academic Nikolai Kondratiev, who devised a theory of 50-year-long business cycles of booms and busts.
George Modelski, a University of Washington political scientist, says the maturing of printing techniques in China in the 10th century was the first K-wave, while the arrival of Intel Corp's microprocessors in the early 1970s is the starting point of the 19th -- and the most recent -- one.
All the waves have started as concentrated bursts of activity that gradually spread in all directions; their primary effect has been to make the host economy rich for two generations, or about 50 or 60 years, and then dissipate.
Viewed from this prism, the brisk economic activity in Asia that is being touted as proof of decoupling may be just what one would expect to see in the diffusion phase of a disruptive technology -- such as the Internet -- - that was hosted elsewhere.
Together with excess telecommunications capacity created during the dot-com bubble, the Internet has made it possible for many tasks -- from analysis of X-ray reports to remotely monitoring the shop-floor inventory at a Detroit automaker -- to be outsourced to the Asian region cost-effectively. Yet, outsourcing is still about satisfying final Western demand.
The current technological cycle won't make Asia a new economic powerhouse; it may set the stage, but the spark will have to come from within. What that innovation might be remains unknown. However, after it does arrive, it will be seen -- with the benefit of hindsight -- as a new 20th wave, or K-20.
What we are witnessing now is the buildup phase of Asia's scientific prowess. Analysis by Albert Hu, an economist at the National University of Singapore, shows that three-fifths of US patents granted to innovators in seven East Asian countries cite prior work done in the US, a figure that has actually risen a little since the early 1990s.
That isn't surprising. There are many more US patents for Asian innovators to cite from than there are Asian ones, as Hu said in a recent paper cowritten with Milan Brahmbhatt, lead economist for Asia-Pacific at the World Bank.
Remove that difference from the equation, and the picture begins to look brighter, especially for South Korea and Taiwan, two of the most technologically advanced countries in Asia outside Japan.
Increasingly the building blocks of South Korean or Taiwanese scientists -- the "prior art" in patenting lingo -- are coming from within their own country or from other Asian nations.
"After controlling for the fact that the potential pool of citable electrical and electronics patents is much smaller than the potential pool in the US, [South] Korean patents cite other [South]Korean patents almost five times as intensively as they do US patents," Brahmbhatt and Hu note.
To a lesser extent, the same is true of Taiwan. Apart from building on the technologies developed by their compatriots, researchers in Taiwan are also making three times more use of South Korean inventions than they are of US patents.
"These trends confirm the growing regional dimension in East Asian knowledge flows," the economists say.
The emergence of local knowledge clusters is crucial for Asia. They will lead to specialization and improve the odds of big-bang innovation, which, in Schumpeter's scheme of things, is the biggest tool any entrepreneur can lay his hands on to "creatively destruct" existing hegemonies.
Until that happens, prosperity in Asia will be subservient to Western demand. And that automatically means that another prerequisite for a decoupled economy -- freedom in setting fiscal and monetary policies -- won't be available to Asian policy makers for many years to come.
BACK TO NORMAL? The move would be part of a gradual easing of curbs monitored by the CECC, which would retain the quarantine mandate if case numbers rise again The Cabinet yesterday approved a plan to next month reopen Taiwan’s borders to all visitors and lift the quarantine mandate for arrivals, provided the nation’s COVID-19 situation does not escalate. The changes are likely to take effect on Oct. 13 as part of a phased easing of border controls that is to start on Thursday next week when a negative polymerase chain reaction test result would no longer be needed, Cabinet spokesman Lo Ping-cheng (羅秉成) told a news conference. Arriving travelers would instead be given four rapid antigen home test kits, Lo said. The three-day quarantine requirement followed by four days of mandatory
The Chinese navy has the ability to blockade Taiwan, but doing so could prompt a coordinated response by the international community to intervene to resolve the crisis for Taiwan, US Vice Admiral Karl Thomas said. “Clearly if they do something that’s non-kinetic, which, you know, a blockade is less kinetic ... then that allows the international community to weigh in and to work together on how we’re going to solve that challenge,” the commander of the US Navy’s 7th Fleet told the Wall Street Journal in an interview published on Monday. While he could not predict whether China would launch a full-scale
‘NO SURRENDER’: A blockade or outlying island seizure would be an act of war, and China’s drills last month have emboldened Taipei in its response plans, an official said The Republic of China Army Command Headquarters has agreed to purchase 5,000 Kestrel close-range anti-armor missiles worth NT$400 million (US$12.63 million) from the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology, according to the military’s latest arms purchase bid notice. The army asked the institute to complete the order within 13 months, a military source said on condition of anonymity. Kestrel missiles are designed to penetrate armored vehicles and are used in anti-surface warfare, as they feature optical sights and night vision, and can be operated in all weather conditions. The missile has a 400m range, or a 150m range when used for breaching brick
COMMITTING TROOPS: The debate over ‘strategic ambiguity’ versus ‘strategic clarity’ in relation to US policy on Taiwan seems to have come to an end, a DPP lawmaker said US military forces would defend Taiwan if there was “an unprecedented attack,” US President Joe Biden said, underscoring the US’ commitment to the nation as Chinese incursions mount near its shores. Asked in a CBS 60 Minutes interview broadcast on Sunday whether US forces would defend Taiwan, Biden replied: “Yes, if in fact, there was an unprecedented attack.” Asked to clarify if he meant that unlike in Ukraine, US forces — American men and women — would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion, Biden replied: “Yes.” The interview was just the latest time that Biden has appeared to go beyond