Wal-Mart's efforts to block the nation's largest sex discrimination lawsuit suffered a big setback on Tuesday when a federal appeals court in San Francisco ruled that the case should proceed as a class action.
In a 2-1 ruling, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Wal-Mart's argument that the lawsuit, which involves at least 1.5 million current and former women employees, was too unwieldy to handle in a single case.
Legal specialists said the ruling would increase pressure on Wal-Mart Stores to settle the case, in which the retailer is accused of discrimination in pay and promotions. Wal-Mart executives said they would appeal, voicing confidence that the decision would be overturned.
PHOTO: AP
The court ruled on Tuesday that the lawsuit should proceed as a class action -- the largest such civil rights case in history -- because it raised common questions of law and fact, because the six named plaintiffs were typical of the class and because there were so many women that it was impractical to handle the matter in individual cases.
The majority wrote, "Plaintiffs' expert opinions, factual evidence, statistical evidence, and anecdotal evidence present significant proof of a corporate policy of discrimination and support plaintiffs' contention that female employees nationwide were subject to a common pattern and practice of discrimination."
Wal-Mart's lead lawyer, Theodore Boutrous Jr, said that Tuesday's decision was not based on the merits of the case.
"Wal-Mart has a strong anti-discrimination policy," he said.
Arguing that the ruling contained factual and legal errors, Boutrous said Wal-Mart would ask the three-judge panel to reconsider the case and would also ask a full panel of 15 9th Circuit judges to consider it.
Boutrous asserted that Tuesday's decision conflicts with Supreme Court rulings and other Circuit Court rulings.
"We are optimistic about the chances of getting further review," Boutrous said. He asserted that the named plaintiffs were not typical of the class and that the case involved no common questions of law or fact.
He pointed to other appeals of court rulings that rejected class-action status involving thousands of plaintiffs, because such cases could prevent individual hearings to determine liability.
In the majority ruling, Judges Harry Pregerson and Michael Daly Hawkins wrote that due process does not require individualized hearings to determine damages.
A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Joseph Sellers, hailed Tuesday's decision. "This ruling confirms that no company, no matter how big, is exempt from the civil rights law, no matter what Wal-Mart claimed," he said.
Brad Seligman, the plaintiffs' lead lawyer, estimated that the class -- which includes all women who have worked at Wal-Mart at any time since Dec. 21, 1998 -- encompasses more than 2 million.
"Simple math, given the size of the class and the types of disparities we've shown, indicate that the losses to women are in the billions," Seligman said.
He said the ruling showed that "it is time for Wal-Mart to face the music."
But Wal-Mart's chief financial officer, Thomas Schoewe, said: "This decision will have no impact on our fiscal year 2007 financial performance. And does not require the company to take any action that will increase its cost of operations."
Peter Hillman, a partner at Chadbourne & Parke who represents management in employment law cases, said the ruling "obviously puts pressure -- incredible pressure -- on Wal-Mart to consider a settlement." He said the chances were slim that a higher court would agree to hear the case.
‘ABUSE OF POWER’: Lee Chun-yi allegedly used a Control Yuan vehicle to transport his dog to a pet grooming salon and take his wife to restaurants, media reports said Control Yuan Secretary-General Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) resigned on Sunday night, admitting that he had misused a government vehicle, as reported by the media. Control Yuan Vice President Lee Hung-chun (李鴻鈞) yesterday apologized to the public over the issue. The watchdog body would follow up on similar accusations made by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and would investigate the alleged misuse of government vehicles by three other Control Yuan members: Su Li-chiung (蘇麗瓊), Lin Yu-jung (林郁容) and Wang Jung-chang (王榮璋), Lee Hung-chun said. Lee Chun-yi in a statement apologized for using a Control Yuan vehicle to transport his dog to a
Taiwan yesterday denied Chinese allegations that its military was behind a cyberattack on a technology company in Guangzhou, after city authorities issued warrants for 20 suspects. The Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau earlier yesterday issued warrants for 20 people it identified as members of the Information, Communications and Electronic Force Command (ICEFCOM). The bureau alleged they were behind a May 20 cyberattack targeting the backend system of a self-service facility at the company. “ICEFCOM, under Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party, directed the illegal attack,” the warrant says. The bureau placed a bounty of 10,000 yuan (US$1,392) on each of the 20 people named in
The High Court yesterday found a New Taipei City woman guilty of charges related to helping Beijing secure surrender agreements from military service members. Lee Huei-hsin (李慧馨) was sentenced to six years and eight months in prison for breaching the National Security Act (國家安全法), making illegal compacts with government employees and bribery, the court said. The verdict is final. Lee, the manager of a temple in the city’s Lujhou District (蘆洲), was accused of arranging for eight service members to make surrender pledges to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army in exchange for money, the court said. The pledges, which required them to provide identification
INDO-PACIFIC REGION: Royal Navy ships exercise the right of freedom of navigation, including in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea, the UK’s Tony Radakin told a summit Freedom of navigation in the Indo-Pacific region is as important as it is in the English Channel, British Chief of the Defence Staff Admiral Tony Radakin said at a summit in Singapore on Saturday. The remark came as the British Royal Navy’s flagship aircraft carrier, the HMS Prince of Wales, is on an eight-month deployment to the Indo-Pacific region as head of an international carrier strike group. “Upholding the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and with it, the principles of the freedom of navigation, in this part of the world matters to us just as it matters in the