America has a lot. Afghanistan needs everything. But US companies capable of selling to that shattered country are balking at doing business there.
A conference of international donors this weekend could speed up the release of billions to rebuild Afghanistan, opening potentially lucrative business opportunities.
However, big US companies, even traditional risk-takers, are gun shy. "There are still bombs falling, there are still people being shot," says Alexander Winslow, speaking for engineering giant Bechtel.
"As of now, we have no plans where Afghanistan is concerned."
New York business analyst Jeffrey Rogers says he can't imagine a corporate leader telling stockholders he's found a great investment opportunity -- in Afghanistan. The economy is too weak here and the danger too great there.
"It's just not the kind of risk anyone is prepared to take right now," he said. "I can't imagine they will take a risk like that for some time."
In past times and other places, US companies have ventured into unsettled foreign lands, drawn by low operating costs, big financial incentives and a local corporate vacuum.
Afghanistan's reputation for banditry and chaos is so far proving too intimidating even for them.
"We're not talking about antique companies or rug manufacturers," said Benjamin Danvers of Anderson Consulting in Los Angeles. "There would have to be massive amounts of money to draw in major energy companies and major telecommunications companies. And when that money is gone, will the companies stay?"
Bechtel is busy in other recent hotspots of conflict, building a US$1.3 billion gas treatment plant in Abu Dhabi and a US$900 million highway in Croatia. Afghanistan is getting a pass for now.
Although Afghanistan sorely needs the basics, several US telecommunications companies also said they were not interested.
Lucent Technologies, which has built telephone systems in several African nations, said Afghanistan was not in its future. Sprint, which took a government contract to build a telecommunications system in Bosnia, was skeptical, too.
``It's probably not something we would do,'' said Bill Brougham, Sprint's director of program management. ``If the military asked us to support them, safety would be the highest thing on our agenda.''
Verizon and AT&T made similar comments.
Visiting Afghanistan this week, Secretary of State Colin Powell said America is committed to the country's future and will do much to help. "This country needs everything," he said. "It needs a banking system. It needs a health care system. It needs a sanitation system. It needs a phone system. It needs road construction. Everything you can imagine."
Drawing in business is a prime topic at the donors meeting in Tokyo today. The UN Development Program will present a plan to rebuild the country and an estimate of the cost. So far, US$1.3 billion has been pledged by a group that includes the US, Japan, Russia and Britain. Experts say rebuilding could cost US$6 billion over five years.
Past attempts by US businesses to put down roots in Afghanistan have been thwarted by conflict.
In the 1990s, a group of seven companies planned a US$2 billion gas pipeline between Pakistan and Turkmenistan, via Afghanistan. The deal was dropped in 1998 when the US attacked an Afghan base of Osama bin Laden in retaliation against the bombing of US embassies in Africa.
Unocal, the lead investor in the deal, has turned its attention to building a pipeline from Bangladesh to India.
"We have shifted our priorities toward other parts of the world and other important ventures," said Teresa Covington, speaking for the company. "You can't just turn back around after leaving a US$2 billion deal. We have a full plate."
Although companies in Korea and Japan were involved, too, energy analysts say it is unlikely the Afghan pipeline could be done without a major US company.
The CIA has a message for Chinese government officials worried about their place in Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) government: Come work with us. The agency released two Mandarin-language videos on social media on Thursday inviting disgruntled officials to contact the CIA. The recruitment videos posted on YouTube and X racked up more than 5 million views combined in their first day. The outreach comes as CIA Director John Ratcliffe has vowed to boost the agency’s use of intelligence from human sources and its focus on China, which has recently targeted US officials with its own espionage operations. The videos are “aimed at
STEADFAST FRIEND: The bills encourage increased Taiwan-US engagement and address China’s distortion of UN Resolution 2758 to isolate Taiwan internationally The Presidential Office yesterday thanked the US House of Representatives for unanimously passing two Taiwan-related bills highlighting its solid support for Taiwan’s democracy and global participation, and for deepening bilateral relations. One of the bills, the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, requires the US Department of State to periodically review its guidelines for engagement with Taiwan, and report to the US Congress on the guidelines and plans to lift self-imposed limitations on US-Taiwan engagement. The other bill is the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which clarifies that UN Resolution 2758 does not address the issue of the representation of Taiwan or its people in
US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo on Friday expressed concern over the rate at which China is diversifying its military exercises, the Financial Times (FT) reported on Saturday. “The rates of change on the depth and breadth of their exercises is the one non-linear effect that I’ve seen in the last year that wakes me up at night or keeps me up at night,” Paparo was quoted by FT as saying while attending the annual Sedona Forum at the McCain Institute in Arizona. Paparo also expressed concern over the speed with which China was expanding its military. While the US
SHIFT: Taiwan’s better-than-expected first-quarter GDP and signs of weakness in the US have driven global capital back to emerging markets, the central bank head said The central bank yesterday blamed market speculation for the steep rise in the local currency, and urged exporters and financial institutions to stay calm and stop panic sell-offs to avoid hurting their own profitability. The nation’s top monetary policymaker said that it would step in, if necessary, to maintain order and stability in the foreign exchange market. The remarks came as the NT dollar yesterday closed up NT$0.919 to NT$30.145 against the US dollar in Taipei trading, after rising as high as NT$29.59 in intraday trading. The local currency has surged 5.85 percent against the greenback over the past two sessions, central