America has a lot. Afghanistan needs everything. But US companies capable of selling to that shattered country are balking at doing business there.
A conference of international donors this weekend could speed up the release of billions to rebuild Afghanistan, opening potentially lucrative business opportunities.
However, big US companies, even traditional risk-takers, are gun shy. "There are still bombs falling, there are still people being shot," says Alexander Winslow, speaking for engineering giant Bechtel.
"As of now, we have no plans where Afghanistan is concerned."
New York business analyst Jeffrey Rogers says he can't imagine a corporate leader telling stockholders he's found a great investment opportunity -- in Afghanistan. The economy is too weak here and the danger too great there.
"It's just not the kind of risk anyone is prepared to take right now," he said. "I can't imagine they will take a risk like that for some time."
In past times and other places, US companies have ventured into unsettled foreign lands, drawn by low operating costs, big financial incentives and a local corporate vacuum.
Afghanistan's reputation for banditry and chaos is so far proving too intimidating even for them.
"We're not talking about antique companies or rug manufacturers," said Benjamin Danvers of Anderson Consulting in Los Angeles. "There would have to be massive amounts of money to draw in major energy companies and major telecommunications companies. And when that money is gone, will the companies stay?"
Bechtel is busy in other recent hotspots of conflict, building a US$1.3 billion gas treatment plant in Abu Dhabi and a US$900 million highway in Croatia. Afghanistan is getting a pass for now.
Although Afghanistan sorely needs the basics, several US telecommunications companies also said they were not interested.
Lucent Technologies, which has built telephone systems in several African nations, said Afghanistan was not in its future. Sprint, which took a government contract to build a telecommunications system in Bosnia, was skeptical, too.
``It's probably not something we would do,'' said Bill Brougham, Sprint's director of program management. ``If the military asked us to support them, safety would be the highest thing on our agenda.''
Verizon and AT&T made similar comments.
Visiting Afghanistan this week, Secretary of State Colin Powell said America is committed to the country's future and will do much to help. "This country needs everything," he said. "It needs a banking system. It needs a health care system. It needs a sanitation system. It needs a phone system. It needs road construction. Everything you can imagine."
Drawing in business is a prime topic at the donors meeting in Tokyo today. The UN Development Program will present a plan to rebuild the country and an estimate of the cost. So far, US$1.3 billion has been pledged by a group that includes the US, Japan, Russia and Britain. Experts say rebuilding could cost US$6 billion over five years.
Past attempts by US businesses to put down roots in Afghanistan have been thwarted by conflict.
In the 1990s, a group of seven companies planned a US$2 billion gas pipeline between Pakistan and Turkmenistan, via Afghanistan. The deal was dropped in 1998 when the US attacked an Afghan base of Osama bin Laden in retaliation against the bombing of US embassies in Africa.
Unocal, the lead investor in the deal, has turned its attention to building a pipeline from Bangladesh to India.
"We have shifted our priorities toward other parts of the world and other important ventures," said Teresa Covington, speaking for the company. "You can't just turn back around after leaving a US$2 billion deal. We have a full plate."
Although companies in Korea and Japan were involved, too, energy analysts say it is unlikely the Afghan pipeline could be done without a major US company.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from