Fri, Sep 27, 2024 page5

• Top economist disappears after criticizing Xi Jinping

  TIGHTENING: Zhu Hengpeng, who worked for an influential think tank, has reportedly not been seen in public since making disparaging remarks on WeChat

  • The Guardian
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  A leading Chinese economist at a government think tank has reportedly disappeared after being disciplined for criticizing Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in a private chat group.

  Zhu Hengpeng (朱恆鵬), 55, is believed to have made disparaging remarks about China’s economy, and potentially about the Chinese leader specifically, in a private WeChat group. Zhu was subsequently detained in April and put under investigation, the Wall Street Journal reported.

  Zhu worked for the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) for more than 20 years, most recently as the Institute of Economics deputy director and director of the Public Policy Research Center. He has reportedly not been seen in public since April when he spoke at an event organized by Chinese media outlet Caixin, which he had done previously. Efforts by the Wall Street Journal to contact him at home were unsuccessful.

  

  Chinese President Xi Jinping presses a button to vote on work reports during the closing session of the Chinese National People’s Congress held at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on March 11.

  Photo. AFP

  Earlier this month, Hong Kong media reported a shakeup of the institute’s senior ranks, with the director and secretary also removed from their posts at the same time Zhu was stripped of his role. The other two officials were reassigned, Sing Tao Daily said.

  Zhu is no longer listed on the CASS Web site.

  Web sites related to his work at Tsinghua University have also been taken offline, although the Guardian could not confirm when.

  The CASS is a leading think tank in China, which reports directly to the Cabinet of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the State Council, and has long been an influential policy adviser, sometimes providing relatively frank analysis.

  However, under the increasingly authoritarian rule of Xi, criticism of the CCP and his individual leadership has become increasingly frowned upon, and treated punitively.

  China-based academics have previously told the Guardian of a growing fear among their profession of reporting or discussing negative assessments of China’s economic, social or political situation for fear of reprisals.

  Discussion of Xi as an individual, especially in online spaces which are censored and monitored, is largely avoided or done through vague or coded statements.

  Notices on the CASS Web site show staff engaging in several political education sessions in recent months, with a heavy focus on party loyalty and adherence to “Xi Jinping Thought” — the name given to the enshrined political ideology of the CCP leader.

  “The meeting emphasized that we must always bear in mind that the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences is a political institution whose work is centered on scientific research, put strict enforcement of the party’s political discipline first and work hard to enforce strict discipline and abide by rules,” said a report on one July meeting, led by CASS president Gao Xiang (高翔).

  Gao, a Xi loyalist, was appointed to the role in 2022 and has overseen a campaign to improve party loyalty at the institution.

  The specifics of what Zhu wrote in the private WeChat group are not known, although Sing Tao Daily described it as “improperly discussed central policies.”

  The Wall Street Journal also reported he allegedly made a reference to “Xi’s mortality.”

  China’s economy is struggling, and there are concerns that the world’s second-largest economy would miss its own 5 percent annual growth target, a relatively modest ambition by historic standards.

  On Tuesday, the country’s central bank announced the biggest stimulus efforts in years in a bid to boost growth, but experts expressed concern the measures, including a cut in interest rates, would not be sufficient.

  A growing crisis in China’s property market has unfolded since authorities cracked down on excessive borrowing by developers, leading many to default on their debts.

  Property developers and owners continue to cope with high mortgage payments, dragging on their ability to invest and grow.

  Regulators have avoided making large-scale cuts to borrowing costs, fearing that the stimulus would reignite a boom in sales and values, creating a fresh property bubble.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    First person arrested as Danjiang Bridge opens

  • 2

    TSMC shares stumble on report, but losses minor

  • 3

    Navy needs 12 subs for modern fleet: CSBC head

  • 4

    Snake on a train spooks riders on Taipei MRT line

  • 5

    HIMARS to be deployed to islands