Mon, Mar 11, 2024 page5

• Ireland reforms ‘comprehensively’ rejected

  Poll CONFUSION: A voter said the wording on one of the referendums was poor, while another said politicians did not explain the need for the change well enough

  • AFP, DUBLIN
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  A dual referendum in Ireland on redefining family and women’s roles in the constitution was “comprehensively” defeated on Saturday, Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said.

  The result came despite that the government — and most opposition parties — had supported the proposed changes.

  The reforms had been intended to widen the definition of the family and clarify language about the duties of women in society that was considered outdated.

  

  People in costumes hold signs against referendums on family and care amendments, as people attend the Friends of Ted Festival, or TedFest, an annual convention held on the largest of the Aran Islands, for fans of the sitcom Father Ted, in Inis Mor, Ireland, on Saturday.

  Photo: Reuters

  All the major political parties had supported a “Yes-Yes” vote and, until recently, polls had suggested a smooth passage for both on International Women’s Day.

  The votes were seen as the latest attempt to reflect the changing face of EU member Ireland, and the waning influence of the once-dominant Catholic Church.

  Referendum Ireland said on Saturday night that 67.69 percent of 1.021 million voters had rejected the amendment on family.

  The change proposed expanding the definition of family from those founded on marriage to also include “durable relationships” such as cohabiting couples and their children.

  The vote on care had aimed to replace old-fashioned language around a mother’s “duties in the home” with a clause recognizing care provided by family members to one another. That was rejected by 73.9 percent of voters.

  “No” campaigners said the concept of “durable relationship” was undefined and confusing and that women and mothers are being “canceled” from the constitution.

  Varadkar said the referendums had been “defeated comprehensively” on “a respectable turnout.”

  “I think we struggled to convince people of the necessity or need for the referendum at all, let alone detail the wording,” he said. “That’s obviously something we’re going to have to reflect on into the weeks and months ahead.”

  Peadar Toibin, the leader of the only parliamentary party to back a “No-No” vote — the conservative Aontu party — welcomed the result as “a significant victory.”

  The government “sold these amendments as if they were progressive and kind of virtue-signaling changes to the constitution,” he said. “In reality, there was very little if any net benefit to people in terms of bread-and-butter support.”

  Niall Slaughter, a 40-year-old bank worker from Dublin, said he voted for the family amendment, but not for the care amendment due to the poor wording of the question.

  “I voted ‘No’ for the second one because of the way it is worded, not that I think a woman’s place should be at home, just because it should have been more simple and straightforward,” he said.

  Caitriona Behan, 55, an adult education worker said that while there was a need for a change, she felt that “politicians didn’t explain the reason to change the constitution well enough.”

  National Women’s Council of Ireland director Orla O’Connor said the results of the referendums had to act as a “wake-up call” for equality and women’s rights.

  “We cannot be complacent in terms of the progress that we are trying to make for women in this country,” she told RTE. “The public have spoken, and we need to really consider that ‘No’ vote and what is behind it and the reasons for it.”
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Napoli’s title hopes shaken by late Genoa equalizer

  • 2

    Kane tastes first title as Bayern bid farewell to Mueller

  • 3

    Barcelona crowned champions

  • 4

    Taiwanese duos triumph in Taipei Open badminton

  • 5

    Entertainers questioned amid military service furor