When Chen picked up his phone to vent his anger at getting a parking ticket, his message on WeChat was a drop in the ocean of daily posts on China’s biggest social network.
However, soon after his tirade against “simple-minded” traffic cops in June, he found himself in the tentacles of the communist country’s omniscient surveillance apparatus.
Chen quickly deleted the post, but officers tracked him down and detained him within hours, accusing him of “insulting the police.”
Photo: AFP
He was locked up for five days for “inappropriate speech.”
His case — one of the thousands logged by a dissident and reported by local media — laid bare the pervasive monitoring that characterizes life in China.
Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took power in 2012, he has reined in the relatively freewheeling social currents of the turn of the century, using a combination of technology, law and ideology to squeeze dissent and preempt threats to his rule.
Ostensibly targeting criminals and aimed at protecting order, social controls have been turned against dissidents, activists and religious minorities, as well as ordinary people — such as Chen — judged to have crossed the line.
Research company Comparitech estimates the average Chinese city has more than 370 security cameras per 1,000 people — making them the most surveilled places in the world — compared with London’s 13 or Singapore’s 18 per 1,000 people. The nationwide “Skynet” urban surveillance project has ballooned, with cameras capable of recognizing faces, clothing and age.
“We are being watched the whole time,” an environmental activist who declined to be named told Agence France-Presse (AFP).
The Chinese Communist Party’s grip is most stark in the far-western region of Xinjiang, where facial recognition and DNA collection have been deployed on Muslim minorities in the name of counterterrorism. The COVID-19 pandemic has turbocharged China’s monitoring, with citizens now tracked on their smartphones via an app that determines where they can go based on green, yellow or red codes.
Regulations rolled out since 2012 closed loopholes that allowed people to purchase SIM cards without giving their names, and mandated government identification for tickets on virtually all forms of transport.
Wang, a Chinese dissident speaking to AFP under a pseudonym due to safety concerns, recalled a time before Xi when censors were not all-knowing and “telling jokes about [former Chinese president] Jiang Zemin (江澤民) on the Internet was actually very popular.”
However, the Chinese Internet — behind the “Great Firewall” since the early 2000s — has become an increasingly policed space. Wang runs a Twitter account tracking thousands of cases of people detained, fined or punished for speech acts since 2013. Real-name verification systems and cooperation between police and social media platforms have seen people punished for a vast array of online offenses.
Platforms such as Sina Weibo employ thousands of content moderators to block politically sensitive keywords, such as tennis star Peng Shuai’s (彭帥) name after she accused a senior politician of sexual assault last year.
Many of the surveillance technologies in use have also been embraced in other countries.
“The real difference in China is the lack of independent media and civil society able to provide meaningful criticism of innovations, or to point out their many flaws,” Jeremy Daum, a fellow at the Paul Tsai China Center at Yale Law School, told AFP.
Xi has reshaped society, with the Chinese Communist Party stipulating what citizens “ought to know, to feel, to think, and say, and do,” professor emeritus of contemporary Chinese studies at the University of Oxford Vivienne Shue told AFP.
Youngsters are kept away from foreign influences, with authorities banning international books and forbidding tutoring companies from hiring overseas teachers. Ideological policing has extended to fashion, with television stations censoring tattoos and earrings on men.
“What disturbs me more is not the censorship itself, but how it shaped the ideology of people,” Wang said, adding that “with dissenting information being eliminated, every Web site becomes a cult, where the government and leaders have to be worshiped.”
Hungarian authorities temporarily detained seven Ukrainian citizens and seized two armored cars carrying tens of millions of euros in cash across Hungary on suspicion of money laundering, officials said on Friday. The Ukrainians were released on Friday, following their detention on Thursday, but Hungarian officials held onto the cash, prompting Ukraine to accuse Hungary’s Russia-friendly government of illegally seizing the money. “We will not tolerate this state banditism,” Ukrainian Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrii Sybiha said. The seven detained Ukrainians were employees of the Ukrainian state-owned Oschadbank, who were traveling in the two armored cars that were carrying the money between Austria and
Kosovar President Vjosa Osmani on Friday after dissolving the Kosovar parliament said a snap election should be held as soon as possible to avoid another prolonged political crisis in the Balkan country at a time of global turmoil. Osmani said it is important for Kosovo to wrap up the upcoming election process and form functional institutions for political stability as the war rages in the Middle East. “Precisely because the geopolitical situation is that complex, it is important to finish this electoral process which is coming up,” she said. “It is very hard now to imagine what will happen next.” Kosovo, which declared
MORE BANS: Australia last year required sites to remove accounts held by under-16s, with a few countries pushing for similar action at an EU level and India considering its own ban Indonesia on Friday said it would ban social media access for children under 16, citing threats from online pornography, cyberbullying, online fraud and Internet addiction. “Accounts belonging to children under 16 on high-risk platforms will start to be deactivated, beginning with YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, X, Bigo Live and Roblox,” Indonesian Minister of Communications and Digital Meutya Hafid said. “The government is stepping in so that parents no longer have to fight alone against the giants of the algorithm. Implementation will begin on March 28, 2026,” she said. The social media ban would be introduced in stages “until all platforms fulfill their
Counting was under way in Nepal yesterday, after a high-stakes parliamentary election to reshape the country’s leadership following protests last year that toppled the government. Key figures vying for power include former Nepalese prime minister K. P. Sharma Oli, rapper-turned-mayor Balendra Shah, who is bidding for the youth vote, and newly elected Nepali Congress party leader Gagan Thapa. In Kathmandu’s tea shops and city squares, people were glued to their phones, checking results as early trends flashed up — suggesting Shah’s centrist Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) was ahead. Nepalese Election Commission spokesman Prakash Nyupane said the counting was ongoing “in a peaceful manner”